Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code --skill privacy-by-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/privacy-by-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/privacy-by-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/privacy-by-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/privacy-by-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/privacy-by-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02238 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00895 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
privacy-by-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Privacy by Design
The seven foundational principles of Privacy by Design with practical implementation patterns for software engineering.
Knowledge Base
Origin and Context
Privacy by Design (PbD) was developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, former Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada. The framework was formally adopted as an international standard in 2010 by the International Assembly of Privacy Commissioners. GDPR Article 25 codified "data protection by design and by default" into law, making PbD a legal requirement for organizations processing EU residents' data.
PbD is not a checklist -- it is a design philosophy. The principles guide architectural decisions, feature design, and engineering practices throughout the system lifecycle.
The Seven Foundational Principles
Principle 1: Proactive not Reactive; Preventive not Remedial
Privacy measures must be designed in from the start, not added after privacy incidents occur.
Implementation patterns:
- Include privacy requirements in feature specifications alongside functional requirements
- Conduct privacy threat modeling (LINDDUN) during architecture design
- Perform DPIAs before building high-risk features, not after launch
- Include privacy criteria in definition-of-done for user stories
Anti-patterns:
- Building features first, then "adding privacy later"
- Conducting privacy reviews only when regulators ask
- Treating privacy incidents as the trigger for privacy improvements
Principle 2: Privacy as the Default Setting
Users should not need to take action to protect their privacy. The most privacy-protective settings must be the defaults.
Implementation patterns:
# Default to most restrictive sharing
class UserProfile:
profile_visibility = "private" # NOT "public"
location_sharing = False # NOT True
activity_tracking = False # NOT True
third_party_data_sharing = False # NOT True
marketing_communications = False # NOT True
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +5 lines · +46 tokens per session 82a3617287cb
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6cceaea36a04
privacy-by-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,238 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-devsecops-security-scanning
Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…
building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
implementing-runtime-application-self-protection
Deploy Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) agents to detect and block attacks from within application runtime, covering OpenRASP integration, attack pattern detection, and security policy configuration for Java and Python web applications.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
audit-production-readiness
Audit a repository or service for release-blocking bugs, security, data/privacy, AI-agent, supply-chain, operability, and scale risks. Use for deep code audits, threat models, pre-production reviews, vulnerability triage, incidents, defensive investigation, release gates, or evidence-based 10k-to-1M-user readiness.