Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/heyayushh/stacc/visualizenpx skills add heyAyushh/stacc --skill visualizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/heyAyushh/staccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyayushh/stacc/visualize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyayushh/stacc/visualize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heyayushh/stacc/visualize.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00450 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00225 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
visualize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Visualize - Generate Mermaid Diagram
Analyze input and generate clear, well-structured Mermaid diagrams.
Workflow
-
Analyze input - Understand what to visualize (code flow, architecture, data relationships, state machines, sequences, etc.)
-
Choose diagram type:
flowchart- Process flows, decision trees, algorithmssequenceDiagram- API calls, message passing, request/responseclassDiagram- Class structures, inheritance, interfaceserDiagram- Database schemas, entity relationshipsstateDiagram-v2- State machines, lifecycle flowsgraph TD/LR- Dependency graphs, module relationshipsgitgraph- Git branching strategiesjourney- User journeysgantt- Timelines and schedules
-
Generate diagram with:
- Clear, descriptive node labels
- Logical grouping with subgraphs where appropriate
- Consistent styling and direction
- Meaningful relationship labels on edges
- Manageable complexity (split if needed)
-
Output in mermaid code block:
```mermaid [diagram code] ```
Style Guidelines
- Use descriptive IDs:
userServicenota1 - Add labels to relationships when they add clarity
- Use subgraphs to group related components
- Keep readable: max ~15-20 nodes per diagram
- Arrow styles:
-->solid (main flow)-.->dotted (optional/async)==>thick (important path)o-->circle end (aggregation)*-->diamond end (composition)
After Generating
- Explain what the diagram shows
- Offer to refine or expand specific sections
- Suggest alternative diagram types if applicable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 57 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 384c26110740
visualize is a skill published in the GitHub repository heyAyushh/stacc (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 450 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…