Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp --skill lemonsqueezy-webhook-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp/lemonsqueezy-webhook-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp/lemonsqueezy-webhook-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp/lemonsqueezy-webhook-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp/lemonsqueezy-webhook-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp/lemonsqueezy-webhook-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01082 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
lemonsqueezy-webhook-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: lemonsqueezy-webhook-test
Goal: Catch broken webhook handlers, signature mismatches and misrouted events before the first real customer hits checkout — against your handler, whatever framework it runs on.
Strategy
Lemon Squeezy has no official "send test webhook" API. This skill works around it
by constructing webhook payloads itself and signing them with your shared
secret, then POSTing them to your handler. It works against any endpoint where
you control the secret — a local dev server (http://localhost:3000/...), a
staging URL, or a preview deployment.
Inputs
webhookUrl: "http://localhost:3000/api/webhooks/lemonsqueezy" # your handler
webhookSecret: "<your Lemon Squeezy webhook signing secret>"
events: # which events to exercise — pick your own
- subscription_created
- subscription_updated
- order_created
customData: {} # optional arbitrary map merged into meta.custom_data
# e.g. { user_id: "user_123" } if your handler binds by user
signatureHeader: "X-Signature" # optional override (Lemon Squeezy default)
eventHeader: "X-Event-Name" # optional override (Lemon Squeezy default)
sampleVariantId: "555444" # optional: variant id used in sub_* payload bodies
Only webhookUrl, webhookSecret and at least one event are required. The
event list is entirely yours — Lemon Squeezy emits roughly a dozen event types
(subscription_*, subscription_payment_*, order_created, license_key_*);
exercise whichever your handler actually implements.
Workflow
- Pre-flight checks
lemonsqueezy_list_webhooksto confirm a webhook is registered in the store- Compare the registered
eventsarray to your requestedevents— flag any you're testing that aren't actually subscribed - Display the registered URL for sanity (no localhost in production!)
- Payload templates — for each event, build a JSON payload that mirrors what
Lemon Squeezy would send (see
examples/webhook-payloads.jsonin this repo for reference shapes). MergecustomDataintometa.custom_datawhen provided. - Signing — compute
<signatureHeader> = HMAC-SHA256(rawBody, webhookSecret)as a hex digest. - POST — send each payload sequentially with headers:
Content-Type: application/json <eventHeader>: <event> <signatureHeader>: <hex> - Assertions per event (handler-agnostic):
- 2xx — handler accepted the payload
- 401 — signature rejected (usually a secret mismatch)
- any other non-2xx — handler-defined; surface the response body verbatim so the user can interpret it against their own logic
- Report:
- Event → status code → latency → pass/fail
- Total latency budget (warn if any single handler > 2s)
- Action items for failures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 102 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 58e1b5ef037c
lemonsqueezy-webhook-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository heysash/lemonsqueezy-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,082 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify
Verify that a code change actually does what it's supposed to by exercising it end-to-end and observing behavior — drive the affected flow, not just tests or typecheck. Run before committing nontrivial changes; bootstraps this repo's project verify skill if none exists yet. Don't invoke it on a diff that only touches…
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
agent-browser
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
memstack-development-webapp-testing
Use when the user says 'write browser tests', 'test this page', 'playwright test', 'e2e test', 'end to end test', 'browser test', 'test the UI', or needs Playwright-based browser testing for a web application. Do NOT use for unit tests, API tests, or non-browser testing.