Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Heyvhuang/ship-faster --skill review-clean-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Heyvhuang/ship-fasterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyvhuang/ship-faster/review-clean-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyvhuang/ship-faster/review-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heyvhuang/ship-faster/review-clean-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyvhuang/ship-faster/review-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heyvhuang/ship-faster/review-clean-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00621 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
review-clean-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Clean Code Review
Focused on 7 high-impact review dimensions based on "Clean Code" principles.
Review Workflow
Review Progress:
- [ ] 1. Scan codebase: identify files to review
- [ ] 2. Check each dimension (naming, functions, DRY, YAGNI, magic numbers, clarity, conventions)
- [ ] 3. Rate severity (High/Medium/Low) for each issue
- [ ] 4. Generate report sorted by severity
Core Principle: Preserve Functionality
All suggestions target implementation approach only—never suggest changing the code's functionality, output, or behavior.
Check Dimensions
1. Naming Issues (Meaningful Names)
Check for:
- Meaningless names like
data1,temp,result,info,obj - Inconsistent naming for same concepts (
get/fetch/retrievemixed)
// ❌
const d = new Date();
const data1 = fetchUser();
// ✅
const currentDate = new Date();
const userProfile = fetchUser();
2. Function Issues (Small Functions + SRP)
Check for:
- Functions exceeding 100 lines
- More than 3 parameters
- Functions doing multiple things
// ❌ 7 parameters
function processOrder(user, items, address, payment, discount, coupon, notes)
// ✅ Use parameter object
interface OrderParams { user: User; items: Item[]; shipping: Address; payment: Payment }
function processOrder(params: OrderParams)
3. Duplication Issues (DRY)
Check for:
- Similar if-else structures
- Similar data transformation/error handling logic
- Copy-paste traces
4. Over-Engineering (YAGNI)
Check for:
if (config.legacyMode)branches that are never true- Interfaces with only one implementation
- Useless try-catch or if-else
// ❌ YAGNI violation: unused compatibility code
if (config.legacyMode) {
// 100 lines of compatibility code
}
5. Magic Numbers (Avoid Hardcoding)
Check for:
- Bare numbers without explanation
- Hardcoded strings
// ❌
if (retryCount > 3) // What is 3?
setTimeout(fn, 86400000) // How long is this?
// ✅
const MAX_RETRY_COUNT = 3;
const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 182 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A e99f06dd51d1
review-clean-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository Heyvhuang/ship-faster (339 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,242 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…