eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis

eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from HHHHHejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills. It costs 37 tokens per session (1,408 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review of AI systems used by an autonomous-vehicle provider against the European Union's AI Act rules for high-risk systems.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for assessing whether an AI system is high-risk and planning work for its technical compliance and conformity assessment.
Why use it?
It helps identify compliance gaps in classification, technical duties, and the process for showing that the system meets the law.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — body not stored (licence); the path alone says nothing.

Good fit It is for assessing whether an AI system is high-risk and planning work for its technical compliance and conformity assessment.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add HHHHHejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills --skill analyze-eu-ai-act-high
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HHHHHejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hhhhhejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills/analyze-eu-ai-act-high.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,408 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.01408
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00704
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00282
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00141

Measured 9d ago against content hash 41b0c22bade5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

corporate-governance/analyze-eu-ai-act-high/SKILL.md · 72 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 72 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 41b0c22bade5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

eu-ai-act-high-risk-gap-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository HHHHHejia/awesome-legal-aiagent-skills (38 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,408 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prowler-compliance

Creates, syncs, audits and manages Prowler compliance frameworks end-to-end. Covers the two supported JSON schemas (universal multi-provider and legacy per-provider), the SDK model tree (legacy attribute classes, universal ComplianceFramework, ConfigRequirements guardrails), output formatters (legacy per-framework +…

prowler-cloud/prowler · 227 tokens

policy

Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.

semantica-agi/semantica · 36 tokens

801-regulations-eu-ai-act

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance…

jabrena/plinth · 108 tokens

813-regulations-iso-42001

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of…

jabrena/plinth · 77 tokens

open-weights

Use when choosing an open-weight LLM and clearing it for use — which family and size fit the task, the hardware and the budget, and above all whether the license permits shipping. Owns the license-class map (OSI-open versus custom-community versus non-commercial), the always-verify-the-model-card rule, size-to-VRAM…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 146 tokens

ai-policy-generator

AI governance policy creation for nonprofits and enterprises with frameworks, risk assessment, ethical guidelines, and compliance templates. Use when drafting AI usage policies, responsible AI frameworks, or organizational AI governance documents.

travisjneuman/.claude · 42 tokens