Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server/main/.codex/skills/aif-verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server/aif-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server/aif-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server/aif-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00571 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
aif-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 373 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 70418de1616d
aif-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,856 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
coding-agents-hooks-authoring
To author, register, and test Rosetta hooks, add a SemanticKind, or debug a hook that won't fire.
shaft-developer
Use when starting any SHAFT testing task to select exactly one lifecycle, implementation, or tool specialist before doing the work.
shaft-change-verification
Use when edited SHAFT Java needs a reuse plan, preview diff, guardrail check, approved application, focused test, and evidence-backed verdict.