Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HK-hub/AgentSkills --skill git-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HK-hub/AgentSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/git-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/git-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/git-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00748 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to git-commit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Commit with Conventional Commits
Overview
Create standardized, semantic git commits using the Conventional Commits specification. Analyze the actual diff to determine appropriate type, scope, and message.
Conventional Commit Format
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
Commit Types
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
feat |
New feature |
fix |
Bug fix |
docs |
Documentation only |
style |
Formatting/style (no logic) |
refactor |
Code refactor (no feature/fix) |
perf |
Performance improvement |
test |
Add/update tests |
build |
Build system/dependencies |
ci |
CI/config changes |
chore |
Maintenance/misc |
revert |
Revert commit |
Breaking Changes
# Exclamation mark after type/scope
feat!: remove deprecated endpoint
# BREAKING CHANGE footer
feat: allow config to extend other configs
BREAKING CHANGE: `extends` key behavior changed
Workflow
1. Analyze Diff
# If files are staged, use staged diff
git diff --staged
# If nothing staged, use working tree diff
git diff
# Also check status
git status --porcelain
2. Stage Files (if needed)
If nothing is staged or you want to group changes differently:
# Stage specific files
git add path/to/file1 path/to/file2
# Stage by pattern
git add *.test.*
git add src/components/*
# Interactive staging
git add -p
Never commit secrets (.env, credentials.json, private keys).
3. Generate Commit Message
Analyze the diff to determine:
- Type: What kind of change is this?
- Scope: What area/module is affected?
- Description: One-line summary of what changed (present tense, imperative mood, <72 chars)
4. Execute Commit
# Single line
git commit -m "<type>[scope]: <description>"
# Multi-line with body/footer
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<type>[scope]: <description>
<optional body>
<optional footer>
EOF
)"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 125 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 554d1a3c6d95
git-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository HK-hub/AgentSkills (6 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 748 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to git-commit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
address-pr-feedback
Unified PR feedback workflow - collect, triage, and fix review comments in a single command.
setup-pre-commit
A setup guide for Git pre-commit checks, which run automatically before a commit is created. It configures Husky, lint-staged, Prettier, type checking, and tests in a repository.
cmux-testing
A regression test for a bug fix ships as two commits so CI proves the test catches the bug.
at-daily-log
Summarize each day's Git activity into a concise daily work log, for a single date or a range. Uses the current repository, optional configured work projects, or paths named in conversation; configuration is never required.
at-commit
Generate a Conventional Commits message from staged changes and wait for confirmation before committing. Use when the user asks to commit or generate a commit message.
git-master
Advanced Git operations — rebase, squash, fixup, blame, bisect, reflog, code archaeology (git log -S/-G), worktrees. Use when the task mentions rebase, squash, bisect, blame, reflog, fixup, finding deleted code, tracing commit history, cleaning up a branch, or recovering lost work.