Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/hook-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/hook-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/hook-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/hook-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hk-hub/agentskills/hook-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.03985 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.01594 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00797 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00398 |
Grade A, and why
hook-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to hook-development — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 713 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hook Development for Claude Code Plugins
Overview
Hooks are event-driven automation scripts that execute in response to Claude Code events. Use hooks to validate operations, enforce policies, add context, and integrate external tools into workflows.
Key capabilities:
- Validate tool calls before execution (PreToolUse)
- React to tool results (PostToolUse)
- Enforce completion standards (Stop, SubagentStop)
- Load project context (SessionStart)
- Automate workflows across the development lifecycle
Hook Types
Prompt-Based Hooks (Recommended)
Use LLM-driven decision making for context-aware validation:
{
"type": "prompt",
"prompt": "Evaluate if this tool use is appropriate: $TOOL_INPUT",
"timeout": 30
}
Supported events: Stop, SubagentStop, UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse
Benefits:
- Context-aware decisions based on natural language reasoning
- Flexible evaluation logic without bash scripting
- Better edge case handling
- Easier to maintain and extend
Command Hooks
Execute bash commands for deterministic checks:
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate.sh",
"timeout": 60
}
Use for:
- Fast deterministic validations
- File system operations
- External tool integrations
- Performance-critical checks
Hook Configuration Formats
Plugin hooks.json Format
For plugin hooks in hooks/hooks.json, use wrapper format:
{
"description": "Brief explanation of hooks (optional)",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [...],
"Stop": [...],
"SessionStart": [...]
}
}
Key points:
descriptionfield is optionalhooksfield is required wrapper containing actual hook events- This is the plugin-specific format
Example:
{
"description": "Validation hooks for code quality",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/validate.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/load-context.sh 1.7 KB runs code
- examples/validate-bash.sh 1.3 KB runs code
- examples/validate-write.sh 1.2 KB runs code
- references/advanced.md 9.9 KB
- references/migration.md 8.1 KB
- references/patterns.md 7.0 KB
- scripts/hook-linter.sh 4.1 KB runs code
- scripts/README.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/test-hook.sh 5.2 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-hook-schema.sh 5.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 713 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A f47e2d42f636
hook-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository HK-hub/AgentSkills (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 3,985 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to hook-development, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-brainstorm
Conversational design workshop for substantial work. Interviews the human one question at a time, explores 2-3 approaches with trade-offs, and presents the design section by section for approval before writing only design.md, then stops. Combines requirements discovery with codebase research and architecture design.…
spec-plan
Write approved implementation plans in one of two modes. Explicit Inline mode creates a conversational plan for bounded work. Spec-backed Plan converts an approved design.md into plan.json. Both modes stop after producing their plan output. Trigger after atelier-orchestrator selects a mode, when the user asks to plan…
atelier-orchestrator
Skill routing and workflow orchestration. Selects Inline Plan or Spec-backed Plan, routes to the correct workflow skill, and manages transitions between phases. Use when starting any conversation or task to determine which planning mode and skill apply.
spec-implement
Continue an approved Spec-backed workflow when the user says "implement", "go", "start", or "do it". After Codex Plan Mode, persist the next missing design.md or plan.json artifact and stop. When both artifacts exist, execute plan.json with TDD and report between batches.
oracle-codebase-design
Shared vocabulary and principles for designing deep modules. Use when designing or changing a module's interface, deciding where a seam goes, handling untrusted input at the edges, choosing the level to test at, naming modules, or making code more testable. Also use when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
code-commit
Generate and validate conventional commit messages following the conventionalcommits.org spec. Use whenever the user wants to commit code, mentions commit messages, git commit, or asks to create a commit. Triggers on "commit", "git commit", "conventional", or when reviewing commit message format.