Hmbown/CodeWhale is an open-source coding agent that runs in the terminal and is written in Rust. Developers use it to inspect repositories, edit files, run commands, and coordinate work with configurable model providers, skills, MCP servers, and approval controls; the catalogue entries extend its available workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Hmbown/CodeWhale --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhaleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/codewhale/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/codewhale/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hmbown/codewhale/webapp-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/codewhale/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hmbown/codewhale/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00139 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Webapp Testing
When to use
Use to prove a web app flow works in a real browser/runtime context.
Non-goals
- Do not claim success from unit tests alone.
- Do not hardcode fragile selectors without observation.
Workflow
- Start or reuse the local app.
- Wait for readiness.
- Inspect DOM/console/network.
- Drive the flow from observed state.
- Record evidence of pass/fail.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 54a739f8bcdc
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Hmbown/CodeWhale (41,081 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 139 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cw-gates
Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.
cw-dogfood
Use when a Codewhale change needs proving in the real product, or when asked to build/install/dogfood the local binaries: stamped release build, atomic install, fresh-shell verification, and the manual QA that gates cannot cover.
computer-use
Desktop control that picks the right interface per step — app scripting (AppleScript/JXA), accessibility-first observation and actions, pixel fallback, screenshots, zoom, screen recording, and switching between registered computers. Qualified on macOS; Windows, Linux and HarmonyOS backends are experimental.
cw-land
Use when turning verified Codewhale work into commits, branches, or a merge: choosing direct-main vs. worktree vs. integration branch, preserving contributor credit, and honoring the gate artifact before merging.
cw-slice
Use before writing code for any Codewhale feature, upgrade, or refactor: find the existing owner of the behavior, bound the change to one reviewable slice, and fix the evidence bar before you start.
cw-handoff
Use when writing a Codewhale takeover prompt, continuation note, or end-of-session summary for another agent or a later session: a paste-ready handoff grounded in live state, with done/suspected/blocked kept separate.