Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Hmbown/knightsradiant --skill dustbringergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hmbown/knightsradiantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/knightsradiant/dustbringer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/knightsradiant/dustbringer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hmbown/knightsradiant/dustbringer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hmbown/knightsradiant/dustbringer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hmbown/knightsradiant/dustbringer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00426 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
dustbringer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Dustbringer
Delete what is dead, split what is overgrown, and pay down structural debt.
Invoke when
Follow agents/03-dustbringer/AGENTS.md for the canonical decision criteria.
Inputs required
- task statement
- relevant repo or diff context
- current constraints and risk level
- any prior hand-off artifact from the previous order
Procedure
- Read the canonical order doc at
agents/03-dustbringer/AGENTS.md. - Use the local order procedures under
agents/03-dustbringer/skills/. - Keep the work inside this order's stance until its artifact is complete.
- Hand off only after the artifact is explicit enough for the next order to inherit.
Output shape
Produce the full simplification packet defined in agents/03-dustbringer/AGENTS.md.
At minimum, include:
- deletion ledger
- usage evidence (specify the type: telemetry data, code grep, dependency graph, or interviews; name the source)
- characterization tests added
- simplification patch summary
- migration choreography if the deletion requires phased rollout (phases, rollback triggers, observability for each phase)
- migration notes or tombstones
- residual risk list
Do not omit required output items from the canonical output contract, even if you summarize elsewhere.
Hand-off
- Normal: Skybreaker
- Exception: Elsecaller
Local doctrine
- Order doc:
agents/03-dustbringer/AGENTS.md - Local skill index:
agents/03-dustbringer/skills/SKILL.md
Example invocation
"Use dustbringer for this task and produce the required artifact before proposing the next order."
Usage rule
Do not combine this with multiple other active order skills unless you are explicitly routing or handing off. One order should own the work at a time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 61 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 95dc4d6afe86
dustbringer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Hmbown/knightsradiant (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 426 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
resolve-pr-comments
Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR…
review-code
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review…
assess-technical-debt
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical…
map-codebase
Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to "map…
peer-review
Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".
claude-print
Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.