common-protocol-enforcement

common-protocol-enforcement is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard. It costs 47 tokens per session (614 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A red-team checklist for verifying that work is genuinely complete and follows the active project rules. Red-team verification means deliberately looking for weaknesses or missed requirements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Auditing completed work, scanning diffs or files after edits, checking protocol compliance, and confirming that commands or artifacts support a completion claim.
Why use it?
It requires fresh evidence after changes and catches skipped instructions, unverified completion claims, and violations introduced during implementation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Auditing completed work, scanning diffs or files after edits, checking protocol compliance, and confirming that commands or artifacts support a completion claim.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill common-protocol-enforcement
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for common-protocol-enforcement

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for common-protocol-enforcement

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-protocol-enforcement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 614 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.00614
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00307
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00123
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00061

Measured 13d ago against content hash 35c6689dd049, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

common-protocol-enforcement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/common/common-protocol-enforcement/SKILL.md · 82 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Protocol Enforcement (Red-Team Verification)

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Red-Team Verification Protocol

Before declaring any task "done" or calling notify_user:

  1. Adversarial Audit: Search for Standard Defaults where project rules should exist.
  2. Protocol Check: Confirm active skills and workflows were loaded before writing.
  3. Evidence Check: Ask what command or artifact proves the completion claim.
  4. Execution Bias Check: Ask whether speed or convenience skipped a structural rule.

** Post-Write Self-Scan**

Immediately after tool call:

  • Scan: Read diff or file content.
  • Match: Check against Anti-Patterns in all active skills.
  • Fix: Re-edit immediately if violation detected.

Red Flags

  • Stop if "done" appears before fresh verification: No completion claim yet.
  • Stop if you relied on memory instead of re-reading files: Reload source of truth.
  • Stop if the shortcut is "small enough to skip protocol": Small changes hide drift.

Rationalization Prevention

  • "The change is tiny": Tiny changes still violate guardrails.
  • "The test passed earlier": Old evidence does not prove current state.
  • "I know the pattern already": Load the active skill anyway.

Anti-Patterns

  • No "Done" Bias: Functional success != Protocol success.
  • No Reliance on Memory: Always retrieval-led (Skill view_file) before write.
  • No Skipping Protocols: "Small changes" where most violations happen.

Execution Bias Detection

Look for:

  • Local mocks instead of shared fakes.
  • Hardcoded styles instead of design tokens.
  • Try-catch blocks without standard error handling.
  • Missing Pre-Write Audit Log in thoughts.

References

Canonical response anchors

When this skill applies, preserve the following domain terminology or equivalent concrete examples in the answer when relevant:

  • active skill

  • active skills

  • reload

  • Additional task-grounded exact anchors: Pre-Write Audit; Standard Defaults; Anti-Patterns

Read the full file on GitHub · 82 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 82 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 35c6689dd049

Subscribe to this mod's changes

common-protocol-enforcement is a skill published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (565 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 614 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.