Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill skill-benchmarkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/skill-benchmark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/skill-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/skill-benchmark/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/skill-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/skill-benchmark.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00710 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00355 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
skill-benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill Benchmark Skill
[!IMPORTANT] Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.
Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.
Instructions
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
📊 Skill Benchmark Orchestrator
Goal: Quantify how much active skills improve implementation quality. Deliver a prioritized compliance delta and skill applicability report.
Step 1 — Project Context & Active Skills
Identify the tech stack and all active skills in AGENTS.md.
# 1. Total source files and lines changed
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20
# 2. Check active skill registry
cat AGENTS.md | head -80
Step 2 — Auto-Select a Legacy Trap
Pick the file automatically. Rank candidates by the severity of anti-patterns:
- 🔴 P0: Hardcoded secrets; Logic inside UI components.
- 🟠 P1: Wrong Router pattern; Global state for local concerns; Missing design tokens.
- 🟡 P2: Raw user-facing strings (i18n).
Step 3 — Build Eval-Driven Scorecard
Source your scorecard from evals/evals.json, not from hardcoded patterns.
Follow the Scorecard Rubric in <SKILLS>/common/common-skill-creator/references/benchmark.md when synced:
- Read
<SKILLS>/<category>/<skill>/evals/evals.json. - Generate columns for Failure Pattern and Success Pattern.
- Refactor the file, citing the exact skill rule for each change.
- For guardrail skills, read
pressure_scenarios,rationalizations,red_flags, andbehavior_assertions.
Step 4 — Benchmark Report & Compliance Delta
Output the scorecard and compliant score using the templates in <SKILLS>/common/common-skill-creator/references/benchmark.md when synced.
- Compliance Score Before vs After.
- Δ Delta: +Z% 🚀.
- Eval Alignment: How well does the skill teach what the eval tests?
- Behavior Coverage: pressure scenarios, rationalizations, red flags, behavior assertions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 93 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 2cc98735a90d
skill-benchmark is a skill published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (565 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 710 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
server-side-calls
Call tRPC procedures directly from server code using t.createCallerFactory() and router.createCaller(context) for integration testing, internal server logic, and custom API endpoints. Catch TRPCError and extract HTTP status with getHTTPStatusCodeFromError(). Error handling via onError option.
verify
Build/launch/drive recipe for verifying apps/docs changes at runtime (demos, docs pages, llms.txt).
testing
Skill "testing" from udecode/plate-playground-template, covering testing goal, core rules, seam selection, fixtures and assertions and quick reference.
playtest
Drive a real browser against a game with vg playtest: smoke checks, scripted bot playtests, softlock detection, screenshots and visual diffs, on localhost or a deployed URL.
debug
Structured bug diagnosis and fixing workflow that reproduces, diagnoses root cause, applies a minimal fix, writes regression tests, and scans for similar patterns.
nextjs-development
Next.js 16.2.4 with TypeScript — App Router, Server Components, use cache directive, Turbopack dev, Server Actions, ISR, SSR, SSG, MCP devtools, metadata API, route handlers, instrumentation.