Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/AI-News-Briefingnpx agentmods add skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-scoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-score)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-score/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/ai-news-briefing/eval-score.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
eval-score scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Eval — Score One Card
Run the LLM-as-judge against one daily briefing card and write the result to eval/store.sqlite.
How to invoke
Prefer the Makefile target. Default JUDGE is stub (offline heuristic, no API). Use JUDGE=claude for the real Claude Haiku 4.5 judge.
make eval D=YYYY-MM-DD # stub backend, no API cost
make eval D=YYYY-MM-DD JUDGE=claude # real Claude judge (~$0.002/card)
make eval D=YYYY-MM-DD JUDGE=claude GATE=1 # also exit 2 if composite < 3.0
Equivalent direct invocation:
python3 eval/runner.py score --date YYYY-MM-DD --judge claude
Behavior
- Read the card JSON at
example-cards/YYYY-MM-DD-card.json(orlogs/YYYY-MM-DD-card.jsonfor fresh runs). - Pull the prior 7 days' headlines from
example-cards/as the novelty baseline. - Compose the judge prompt (
eval/judge_prompt.md) + briefing text + prior headlines. - Send to the selected backend; the judge returns a JSON block with the 5 axis scores plus a
notesfield. - Compute
composite = 0.30·F + 0.20·N + 0.15·D + 0.20·S + 0.15·Cand upsert intoeval_runskeyed on(card_date, prompt_version, judge_model). - Print the result as JSON. With
--gate, exit 2 if composite is below--gate-threshold(default 3.0).
What to tell the user
Report the composite score, the per-axis breakdown, and the judge's notes verbatim — those notes usually call out the weakest axis with a concrete reason. If --gate is set and the run failed, surface that loudly along with the threshold.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 37 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 81942279782c
eval-score is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/AI-News-Briefing (41 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 499 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-context
Detect a repository's languages, frameworks, databases, and observability stack, then load only the relevant Magician lore cores and task-matched deep dives. Use before implementation, debugging, review, performance, database, or logging work when project-specific technical guidance would improve the result, or when…
brainstorming
Interactive spec generation — turn ideas into concrete specs with R-numbered requirements and testable acceptance criteria.
executing
Autonomous task implementation workflow — implement, test, review, commit for each task in the frontier.
backpropagation
Trace runtime bugs back to spec gaps — identify missing acceptance criteria, update specs, generate regression tests, and detect patterns.
design-system
DESIGN.md integration for Forge — ensures visual consistency across all UI tasks through standardized design specifications.
reviewing
Claude-on-Claude code review protocol — reviews implementation against spec requirements and code quality standards.