benchmark

benchmark is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor. It costs 76 tokens per session (818 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A benchmarking tool that compares one or more Claude Code sessions with a rolling average of other sessions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to benchmark recent or selected sessions and see their relative performance across several metrics.
Why use it?
It shows whether a session's cost, token use, tool count, or workflow complexity is typical or unusual.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: $ARGUMENTS substitution, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the ccam-insights plugin — 6 skills, 3 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to benchmark recent or selected sessions and see their relative performance across several metrics.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill benchmark
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install ccam-insights, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 3 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for benchmark

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for benchmark

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/benchmark.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 76 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 818 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00076 $0.00818
Opus 5 $0.00038 $0.00409
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00164
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00082

Measured 8d ago against content hash 0c41d3188c78, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ccam-insights/skills/benchmark/SKILL.md · 68 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Benchmark

Score a session against the rolling population average and report its percentile on cost, tokens, tool count, and complexity using Agent Monitor data.

Input

The user provides: $ARGUMENTS

This may be:

  • A single session ID — benchmark that session
  • "latest" — benchmark the most recent session
  • "latest N" — benchmark the N most recent sessions, each vs the average
  • empty — benchmark the most recent session (default)

Data Sources

Endpoint Returns
GET /api/sessions?limit=N Population of sessions with cost, model, started_at, metadata (turn_count, total_turn_duration_ms) — builds the rolling baseline
GET /api/pricing/cost/{sessionId} { total_cost, breakdown:[{ input_tokens, output_tokens, cache_read_tokens, cache_write_tokens, cost }] } — the target session's cost and tokens
GET /api/workflows/{sessionId} complexity (score), stats (tool/event counts), toolFlow (distinct tools used) — the target session's tool count and complexity
GET /api/analytics avg_events_per_session, tool_usage, daily_sessions — corroborates population-level averages

Report Sections

1. Build the Baseline

Fetch the population with GET /api/sessions?limit=200 (the rolling set). For each session gather cost (GET /api/pricing/cost/{id} or the list cost field), total tokens (sum of the 4 token types from the pricing breakdown), tool count and complexity (GET /api/workflows/{id}). Compute mean, median, and standard deviation for each metric across the population.

2. Measure the Target

For the requested session, pull the same four metrics:

  • Costtotal_cost from GET /api/pricing/cost/{id}.
  • Total tokensinput + output + cache_read + cache_write summed from the breakdown.
  • Tool count — distinct/total tools from GET /api/workflows/{id} stats/toolFlow.
  • Complexity scorecomplexity.score from GET /api/workflows/{id}.

3. Percentile and Deviation

For each metric report the target's percentile within the population (share of sessions at or below it) and its z-score (value − mean) / stddev. Label each: below average / typical / above average / outlier (|z| > 2).

Read the full file on GitHub · 68 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 68 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 0c41d3188c78

Subscribe to this mod's changes

benchmark is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor (989 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 818 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.