Claude Code Agent Monitor is a dashboard that records and displays activity from Claude Code and Codex coding-agent sessions, including tool use and subagent coordination. It is for people who need live visibility into agent work through a web interface or native desktop app. The catalogue entries extend Claude Code with skills, commands, agents, plugins, instructions, hooks, and settings related to the monitor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill transcript-grepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/transcript-grep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/transcript-grep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/transcript-grep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/transcript-grep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/transcript-grep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00669 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00268 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
transcript-grep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Transcript Grep
Find where a pattern appears in a session transcript and show the matches in context.
Input
The user provides: $ARGUMENTS
Interpreted as a session reference plus a search pattern, e.g.
<session-id> "rate limit" or latest TypeError. Parsing rules:
- The session reference is the first token if it looks like an id, or the words
latest/last(most recently updated session). - The remainder is the search pattern (string or regex, quoted if it contains spaces).
- If no session is given, default to the most recent session.
Data Sources
| Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|
GET /api/sessions?limit=N |
session list to resolve latest/last and to confirm the id exists |
GET /api/sessions/:id/transcript |
the ordered transcript messages (role, content, tool calls/results, timestamps) for the session |
Report Sections
1. Resolve the session
If latest/last (or no id), call GET /api/sessions?limit=1. Otherwise verify
the id with GET /api/sessions?limit=1000 (or GET /api/sessions/:id). Report
the resolved id, status, and model before searching.
2. Fetch and search
Call GET /api/sessions/:id/transcript. Walk the messages in order and match the
pattern against message text, tool_name, and tool input/output content.
Case-insensitive by default; treat the pattern as a regex if it contains regex
metacharacters, otherwise as a literal substring.
3. Matches with context
For each match show:
[#N HH:MM:SS role(:tool_name)]
… preceding line of context …
> matching line with the **pattern** emphasized
… following line of context …
Number matches sequentially. Include ±1–2 messages (or lines) of context so the match is interpretable. If a tool call matches, show the tool_name and a trimmed view of its arguments/result.
4. Summary
Report: total matches, how many distinct messages matched, the roles involved (user / assistant / tool), and the timestamp span of the matches. If there are zero matches, say so plainly and suggest a looser pattern.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 67e95dab2e20
transcript-grep is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor (1,121 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 669 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-remediate
Collect and resolve selected findings in one pass, then verify; bare PR targets use online items, while PR +review authorizes matching review evidence and any needed review step.
challenge-resolve
Independently review and fix a bounded task through convergence rounds, with evidence-backed closure and explicit stop/remediation decisions. Use only when the user explicitly requests an adversarial review-and-fix loop over an existing implementation, feature, problem, or diff; not for ordinary review (code-review)…
php-quality-tooling
Use when setting up PHPStan, Rector, or PHP-CS-Fixer on a non-Laravel PHP project, incl. CI wiring. Do NOT use for Laravel (Pint/Larastan), tests, or syntax.
breaking-changes
Use when checking whether a Claude Code update breaks our plugin ecosystem — hooks, agent frontmatter, manifest schema, or skill format.
qa-check
Auto-detects the project's tech stack, then audits for Accessibility, Performance, and Code Quality. Works across WordPress/PHP, Python, Node/JS, and static web projects.
debug-wp
Starts a structured interview to diagnose WordPress issues, then proposes a ranked list of solutions.