Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace --skill implement_plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/implement_plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/implement_plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/implement_plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/implement_plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/implement_plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
implement_plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement Plan
You are tasked with implementing an approved technical plan from ./thoughts/shared/plans/. These plans contain phases with specific changes and success criteria.
Getting Started
When given a plan path:
- Activate the
rpi:document-codeskill - Read the plan completely and check for any existing checkmarks (- [x])
- Read the original ticket and all files mentioned in the plan
- Read files fully - never use limit/offset parameters, you need complete context
- Think deeply about how the pieces fit together
- Create a todo list to track your progress
- Start implementing if you understand what needs to be done
If no plan path provided, ask for one.
Implementation Philosophy
Plans are carefully designed, but reality can be messy. Your job is to:
- Follow the plan's intent while adapting to what you find
- Implement each phase fully before moving to the next
- Verify your work makes sense in the broader codebase context
- Update checkboxes in the plan as you complete sections
When things don't match the plan exactly, think about why and communicate clearly. The plan is your guide, but your judgment matters too.
If you encounter a mismatch:
- STOP and think deeply about why the plan can't be followed
- Present the issue clearly:
Issue in Phase [N]: Expected: [what the plan says] Found: [actual situation] Why this matters: [explanation] How should I proceed?
Verification Approach
After implementing a phase:
- Run the success criteria checks (usually
make check testcovers everything) - Fix any issues before proceeding
- Update your progress in both the plan and your todos
- Check off completed items in the plan file itself using Edit
- Pause for human verification: After completing all automated verification for a phase, pause and inform the human that the phase is ready for manual testing. Use this format:
Phase [N] Complete - Ready for Manual Verification Automated verification passed: - [List automated checks that passed] Please perform the manual verification steps listed in the plan: - [List manual verification items from the plan] Let me know when manual testing is complete so I can proceed to Phase [N+1].
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 9f3556f19ce1
implement_plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace (37 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 700 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-debugging
Systematic debugging protocol for bugs that resist quick fixes. Use bisection, hypothesis trees, and scientific method when a bug isn't obvious from the stack trace. Goes beyond bugfix-quick for production-grade root cause analysis.
self-healing-orchestrator
Proposes patches for F2 (local-logic) and F3 (local-design) failures. NEVER applies without user approval. Confidence ≥0.7 to propose; below that, escalates raw findings. Counts toward replanbudget. Per-task: max 1; per-session: max 5.
test-writer
Write tests with TDD following structured patterns. Ensures consistent AAA structure, proper coverage targets, and framework-specific conventions. Without this skill, tests lack consistent naming, miss coverage targets, and skip anti-pattern checks.
monorepo
Detect and navigate monorepos correctly. Use when working with repos containing multiple packages (pnpm/yarn/npm workspaces, Turborepo, Nx, Lerna). Ensures commands run in correct package scope, dependencies are routed properly, and cross-package changes are coordinated.
api-designer
Designs RESTful APIs with endpoint naming, versioning strategies (URL path, header-based), pagination (offset and cursor), error response schemas, and OpenAPI conventions. Use when the user asks about REST API design, creating endpoints, URL structure, API versioning, status codes, Swagger, or OpenAPI specs.
bugfix-quick
Fast bug fixes with root cause investigation + TDD. Enforces 'no fix without root cause' discipline and verification protocol. Without this skill, fixes are applied at symptoms instead of sources, and bugs return.