Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplacenpx agentmods add skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_planWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/iterate_plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.01885 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00754 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
iterate_plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Iterate Implementation Plan
You are tasked with updating existing implementation plans based on user feedback. You should be skeptical, thorough, and ensure changes are grounded in actual codebase reality.
Initial Response
When this command is invoked:
-
Parse the input to identify:
- Plan file path (e.g.,
./thoughts/shared/plans/2025-10-16/feature.md) - Requested changes/feedback
- Plan file path (e.g.,
-
Handle different input scenarios:
If NO plan file provided:
I'll help you iterate on an existing implementation plan. Which plan would you like to update? Please provide the path to the plan file (e.g., `./thoughts/shared/plans/2025-10-16/feature.md`). Tip: You can list recent plans with `ls -lt ./thoughts/shared/plans/ | head`Wait for user input, then re-check for feedback.
If plan file provided but NO feedback:
I've found the plan at [path]. What changes would you like to make? For example: - "Add a phase for migration handling" - "Update the success criteria to include performance tests" - "Adjust the scope to exclude feature X" - "Split Phase 2 into two separate phases"Wait for user input.
If BOTH plan file AND feedback provided:
- Proceed immediately to Step 1
- No preliminary questions needed
Process Steps
Step 1: Read and Understand Current Plan
-
Read the existing plan file COMPLETELY:
- Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters
- Understand the current structure, phases, and scope
- Note the success criteria and implementation approach
-
Understand the requested changes:
- Parse what the user wants to add/modify/remove
- Identify if changes require codebase research
- Determine scope of the update
Step 2: Research If Needed
Only spawn research tasks if the changes require new technical understanding.
If the user's feedback requires understanding new code patterns or validating assumptions:
- Create a research todo list using TodoWrite
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 249 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 2319618819de
iterate_plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace (37 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,885 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-debugging
Systematic debugging protocol for bugs that resist quick fixes. Use bisection, hypothesis trees, and scientific method when a bug isn't obvious from the stack trace. Goes beyond bugfix-quick for production-grade root cause analysis.
self-healing-orchestrator
Proposes patches for F2 (local-logic) and F3 (local-design) failures. NEVER applies without user approval. Confidence ≥0.7 to propose; below that, escalates raw findings. Counts toward replanbudget. Per-task: max 1; per-session: max 5.
test-writer
Write tests with TDD following structured patterns. Ensures consistent AAA structure, proper coverage targets, and framework-specific conventions. Without this skill, tests lack consistent naming, miss coverage targets, and skip anti-pattern checks.
monorepo
Detect and navigate monorepos correctly. Use when working with repos containing multiple packages (pnpm/yarn/npm workspaces, Turborepo, Nx, Lerna). Ensures commands run in correct package scope, dependencies are routed properly, and cross-package changes are coordinated.
api-designer
Designs RESTful APIs with endpoint naming, versioning strategies (URL path, header-based), pagination (offset and cursor), error response schemas, and OpenAPI conventions. Use when the user asks about REST API design, creating endpoints, URL structure, API versioning, status codes, Swagger, or OpenAPI specs.
bugfix-quick
Fast bug fixes with root cause investigation + TDD. Enforces 'no fix without root cause' discipline and verification protocol. Without this skill, fixes are applied at symptoms instead of sources, and bugs return.