Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hogan-tech/brand-loom --skill hookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hogan-tech/brand-loomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hogan-tech/brand-loom/hook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hogan-tech/brand-loom/hook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hogan-tech/brand-loom/hook/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hogan-tech/brand-loom/hook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hogan-tech/brand-loom/hook.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
hook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hook / Headline Generator
Use when you need scroll-stopping hooks or headlines for a topic. Model-agnostic (OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/Ollama).
Quick start
- CLI:
brand-loom run hook --text "How we cut cloud costs 40%" - Chain:
brand-loom chain hook,caption --text "How we cut cloud costs 40%" --brand brand.json - Python:
from brand_loom.agent import run_skill from brand_loom.providers import use_provider use_provider("openai") # or "anthropic", "gemini", "ollama", "fake" result = run_skill("hook", "your topic here") print(result.text)
Install
pip install brand-loom # standalone (no coding agent needed)
npx skills add hogan-tech/brand-loom # via skills.sh
Going further
Want hooks auto-matched to your brand voice, across every platform, no setup? → neoxra.com
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A fb71f6681bad
hook is a skill published in the GitHub repository hogan-tech/brand-loom (25 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
linkedin-humanizer
Remove AI tells from LinkedIn posts/comments: 2026 vocabulary density, reveal bridges, staccato fragments, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Tiered rewriter plus --mode audit LinkedIn post auditor and --mode profile voice builder. Not for drafting from scratch (use linkedin-post-writer) or beating AI detectors.…
linkedin-marketing
Plan, draft, audit, and publish LinkedIn posts and comments. Use when the user wants to write a viral LinkedIn post, draft a comment or reply on any LinkedIn post URL, audit a draft against 2026 algorithm heuristics, remove AI tells, extract hook formulas from viral posts, or plan a week of content. Powered by the…
linkedin-reply-handler
Draft a reply to one LinkedIn comment from its URL, or sweep a whole thread from just the post URL and draft a reply to every comment worth answering, in one batch. Use for replying to a comment, following an author reply, or clearing all comments on a post. Resolves the correct parentComment (LinkedIn flattens…
linkedin-post-writer
Draft a new LinkedIn post from scratch using one of 20 2026 hook formulas (anaphora, R.I.P., time-anchor, curiosity-gap, contrarian, controlled A/B, false-binary, and more) plus a founders-edition angle library, picked by engagement goal (comments, reposts, likes, saves). Runs the humanizer pass and schedules via…
linkedin-comment-drafter
Draft a LinkedIn comment on someone else's post from its URL, or reshare (repost) it to your feed with optional commentary. Use when the user pastes a post URL and asks to comment, engage, be first commenter, or repost with their thoughts. Produces 1-3 variants in the user's voice, picks a reaction, and publishes via…
linkedin-content-planner
Generate a 7-day LinkedIn content plan from a theme, audience, and pillars. Produces per-day post pillar, format, hook type, CTA, posting time, daily comment targets, and a weekly inbound-readiness check. Use when the user wants to plan a week or month of content, not draft a single post (use linkedin-post-writer).