Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hollandkevint/data-product-operator --skill data-pipeline-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hollandkevint/data-product-operatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hollandkevint/data-product-operator/data-pipeline-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hollandkevint/data-product-operator/data-pipeline-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hollandkevint/data-product-operator/data-pipeline-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hollandkevint/data-product-operator/data-pipeline-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hollandkevint/data-product-operator/data-pipeline-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.00977 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00489 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
data-pipeline-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Pyramid for Data
Run tests in this order. Cheapest and fastest first:
| Layer | What It Catches | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Schema tests (run first) | Structural failures | Column types, not-null, uniqueness, accepted values |
| Business rule tests | Logic errors | Cross-field validation, referential integrity, range checks |
| Integration tests (run last) | System-level drift | Cross-system reconciliation, end-to-end row counts |
Schema tests are cheap. Run them on every pipeline execution. Business rule tests are mid-tier — run them on staging and production. Integration tests are expensive — run them on a schedule (daily or pre-release).
dbt Test Patterns
Generic tests for reusable checks. Apply across models:
models:
- name: fct_encounters
columns:
- name: encounter_id
tests: [not_null, unique]
- name: encounter_type
tests:
- accepted_values:
values: ['inpatient', 'outpatient', 'emergency', 'observation']
- name: patient_id
tests:
- relationships:
to: ref('dim_patient')
field: patient_id
Custom generic test for row count tolerance:
{% test row_count_within_tolerance(model, min_count, max_count) %}
select count(*) as row_count
from {{ model }}
having count(*) < {{ min_count }} or count(*) > {{ max_count }}
{% endtest %}
Singular tests for business logic specific to one model. Use singular tests when the logic doesn't generalize.
Data Contracts
A data contract is a product spec for your data. It defines what consumers can depend on.
contract:
name: fct_encounters
version: 2
owner: data-platform-team
sla:
freshness: "< 4 hours from source update"
completeness: ">= 99.5% of expected rows"
accuracy: ">= 99.9% match to source of record"
schema:
encounter_id: {type: bigint, nullable: false, unique: true}
patient_id: {type: bigint, nullable: false}
encounter_date: {type: date, nullable: false}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 0e6abae2c1e9
- 12d ago First seen · 106 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A b39ccd88591b
data-pipeline-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository hollandkevint/data-product-operator (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 977 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
dummy-dataset
Generate realistic dummy datasets for testing with customizable columns, constraints, and output formats (CSV, JSON, SQL, Python script). Use when creating test data, building mock datasets, or generating sample data for development and demos.
goal-test
A local experiment for testing a goal command that keeps an AI coding session working until a stated condition is judged complete. It uses a separate language model to evaluate the conversation after each assistant turn.
prompt-testing
Use when comparing two prompt variants, defining quality/efficiency/robustness metrics, or deciding whether to adopt a challenger prompt over a baseline.
mutation-test
Mutation testing with two engines. Uses the project's NATIVE mutation runner (StrykerJS / Infection / mutmut / PIT / cargo-mutants) when one is configured — installing it on explicit consent when it is not — for a reproducible, comparable score; and an LLM-guided engine for the mutation classes native mutators cannot…
deep-plan
Creates detailed, sectionized, TDD-oriented implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
wave-execution-framework-v2
Use when executing multi-wave engineering work needing strict TDD, bug-capture/fix split, quality gates, and orchestrated teams with per-agent Opus-advisor / Sonnet-executor model routing.