Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hookdeck/webhook-skills --skill crossmint-webhooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hookdeck/webhook-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/crossmint-webhooks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/crossmint-webhooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/crossmint-webhooks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/crossmint-webhooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/crossmint-webhooks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02295 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00918 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00459 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
crossmint-webhooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
73% identical to adyen-webhooks — 188 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Crossmint Webhooks
Crossmint is a wallets, checkout, NFT-minting, verifiable-credential and stablecoin offramp platform. One project-level webhook system carries events from every product: you add an endpoint in the Crossmint console and receive signed JSON POSTs. Deliveries are sent through Svix, so they carry svix-id, svix-timestamp and svix-signature headers and the endpoint's signing secret starts with whsec_.
When to Use This Skill
- How do I receive Crossmint webhooks?
- How do I verify a Crossmint webhook signature (
svix-signature)? - Where do I find my Crossmint webhook signing secret (
whsec_...)? - How do I handle
wallets.transfer.in,orders.delivery.completedornfts.create.succeededevents? - Why do Crossmint webhook bodies have different shapes (
idvsactionId)? - Why is my Crossmint webhook verification failing?
Verification (core)
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
svix-id |
Identifies the message; retries reuse it |
svix-timestamp |
Unix seconds |
svix-signature |
One or more space-separated v1,<base64> entries |
Signed content is {svix-id}.{svix-timestamp}.{raw body}, HMAC-SHA256, base64 output. The key is the base64-decoded part of the whsec_... secret after the prefix. Compare against every v1, entry; ignore other versions. If svix-id is absent, read webhook-id, webhook-timestamp and webhook-signature instead, as Hookdeck does. The examples use the svix library (npm and PyPI):
import { Webhook } from 'svix';
// rawBody: exact request body (Buffer or string), NOT re-serialised JSON
function verifyCrossmint(rawBody, headers, secret = process.env.CROSSMINT_WEBHOOK_SECRET) {
const p = headers['svix-id'] ? 'svix' : 'webhook'; // fall back to the Standard Webhooks names
const [id, timestamp, signature] = ['id', 'timestamp', 'signature'].map((k) => headers[`${p}-${k}`]);
new Webhook(secret).verify(rawBody, {
'svix-id': id, 'svix-timestamp': timestamp, 'svix-signature': signature,
'webhook-id': id, 'webhook-timestamp': timestamp, 'webhook-signature': signature,
}); // throws on a bad signature or stale timestamp → respond 400
}
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/express/.env.example 212 B
- examples/express/package.json 565 B
- examples/express/README.md 2.5 KB
- examples/express/src/index.js 5.4 KB runs code
- examples/express/test/webhook.test.js 7.2 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/.env.example 212 B
- examples/fastapi/main.py 5.2 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/README.md 2.6 KB
- examples/fastapi/requirements.txt 111 B
- examples/fastapi/test_webhook.py 7.0 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/.env.example 212 B
- examples/nextjs/app/webhooks/crossmint/route.ts 5.1 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/package.json 637 B
- examples/nextjs/README.md 2.6 KB
- examples/nextjs/test/webhook.test.ts 7.6 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/vitest.config.ts 164 B runs code
- references/overview.md 4.2 KB
- references/setup.md 1.4 KB
- references/verification.md 6.6 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 143 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 95261efe2e36
crossmint-webhooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository hookdeck/webhook-skills (98 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,295 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 73% identical to adyen-webhooks, differing in 188 lines, and is treated as a copy.
crossmint-webhooks compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crossmint-webhookshookdeck/webhook-skills | Skill | 98 | yesterday | MIT | A | 88 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |