Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hookdeck/webhook-skills --skill docusign-webhooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hookdeck/webhook-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/docusign-webhooks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/docusign-webhooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/docusign-webhooks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/docusign-webhooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/docusign-webhooks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01660 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
docusign-webhooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to adyen-webhooks — 168 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DocuSign Webhooks
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up DocuSign Connect webhook handlers
- Debugging DocuSign HMAC signature verification failures
- Understanding DocuSign envelope and recipient event types and payloads
- Handling
envelope-completed,recipient-completed, or other Connect events - Verifying the
X-DocuSign-Signature-1header
Verification (core)
DocuSign Connect signs the raw request body with HMAC-SHA256 keyed on your Connect HMAC secret and sends the digest as base64 in X-DocuSign-Signature-1. When multiple HMAC keys are active it sends one header per key (X-DocuSign-Signature-1, X-DocuSign-Signature-2, … up to 100); only one needs to match. The x-authorization-digest header names the algorithm (HMACSHA256). This is not the Standard Webhooks spec. The event type lives in the JSON body's event field (e.g. envelope-completed), not in a header.
Node:
const crypto = require('crypto');
// Collect every X-DocuSign-Signature-N header; any match = authentic.
function verify(rawBody, headers, secret) {
const expected = crypto.createHmac('sha256', secret).update(rawBody).digest('base64');
const signatures = Object.keys(headers)
.filter((h) => h.toLowerCase().startsWith('x-docusign-signature-'))
.map((h) => headers[h]);
return signatures.some((sig) => {
try {
return crypto.timingSafeEqual(Buffer.from(sig), Buffer.from(expected));
} catch {
return false; // length mismatch = not a match
}
});
}
Python:
import hmac, hashlib, base64
def verify(raw_body: bytes, headers, secret: str) -> bool:
expected = base64.b64encode(
hmac.new(secret.encode(), raw_body, hashlib.sha256).digest()
).decode()
sigs = [v for k, v in headers.items() if k.lower().startswith("x-docusign-signature-")]
return any(hmac.compare_digest(sig, expected) for sig in sigs)
Important: Verify against the exact raw body bytes DocuSign sent. Any re-serialization (pretty-printing, JSON round-trip) changes the bytes and breaks the signature.
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/express/.env.example 131 B
- examples/express/package.json 413 B
- examples/express/README.md 1.3 KB
- examples/express/src/index.js 4.3 KB runs code
- examples/express/test/webhook.test.js 4.8 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/.env.example 131 B
- examples/fastapi/main.py 3.5 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/README.md 1.5 KB
- examples/fastapi/requirements.txt 104 B
- examples/fastapi/test_webhook.py 4.8 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/.env.example 131 B
- examples/nextjs/app/webhooks/docusign/route.ts 3.5 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/package.json 492 B
- examples/nextjs/README.md 1.3 KB
- examples/nextjs/test/webhook.test.ts 4.5 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/vitest.config.ts 140 B runs code
- references/overview.md 4.7 KB
- references/setup.md 3.7 KB
- references/verification.md 4.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 26d9a5aceb04
docusign-webhooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository hookdeck/webhook-skills (92 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to adyen-webhooks, differing in 168 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…