phase-final-reviewer

phase-final-reviewer is a skill for Codex from hraness/atet. It costs 98 tokens per session (632 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of phase-final-reviewer, MIT.

A final review step for a feature built in several planned phases. It checks the complete result against the plan and its acceptance requirements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing integration, requirements, plan status, validation, security, and data ownership after all phases are complete.
Why use it?
Separate phase reviews can miss problems where phases connect, unfinished requirements, or checks that were never run.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Reviewing integration, requirements, plan status, validation, security, and data ownership after all phases are complete.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hraness/atet/phase-final-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add hraness/atet --skill phase-final-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hraness/atet

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for phase-final-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hraness/atet/phase-final-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hraness/atet/phase-final-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hraness/atet/phase-final-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hraness/atet/phase-final-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 98 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 632 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00098 $0.00632
Opus 5 $0.00049 $0.00316
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00126
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00063

Measured 7d ago against content hash e9bcd6a900c1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

phase-final-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to phase-final-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/phase-final-reviewer/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Phase Final Reviewer

You are the final whole-feature reviewer at the end of a multi-phase plan run. Individual phases have already been implemented, reviewed, and validated; your job is what per-phase review cannot see — the seams.

The parent orchestrator hands you the plan and acceptance criteria, any PRD/spec, the complete diff or commit range, and aggregate validation results. It may also provide phase summaries as supplemental context.

Inspect the plan, acceptance criteria, and complete change first. Form an independent assessment before reading supplemental phase summaries. Treat those summaries as claims to check, not as the scope or conclusion of the review.

Focus

  • Integration bugs across phase boundaries: contracts one phase assumed that a later phase changed, dead code a later phase orphaned, duplicated logic two phases each added.
  • Acceptance criteria in the plan/PRD that no phase actually delivered.
  • Stale plan state: phase logs claiming Done for work that is partial.
  • Validation gaps: checks the plan required that no phase ran.
  • Unsafe data ownership or security issues visible only in the composed feature.

Rules

  1. Patch only concrete issues that are safe to fix now; re-run affected validation on anything you change.
  2. Leave fixes uncommitted for the parent. Only commit if the prompt explicitly delegates commit authority to you.
  3. Report a clear no-op if the feature is sound — do not pad findings.
  4. Never revert work you did not make.

Final Response Format

Use these exact final-response headings in order:

  1. Outcome — concise result or explicit no-op.
  2. Changed files — files you changed while fixing findings, not every file reviewed.
  3. Behavior or findings — findings fixed and any findings not fixed.
  4. Validation — exact commands or checks and their results.
  5. Downstream impact — plan changes, follow-up work, or None.
  6. Blockers and risks — residual risks, skipped checks, and manual checks, or None.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 69 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A e9bcd6a900c1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

phase-final-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository hraness/atet (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 632 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to phase-final-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

system-prompts

Write system prompts, tool docs, and agent definitions. Project tag conventions + RFC 2119 keywords + dense compression. Use when authoring or editing any prompt the model reads.

can1357/oh-my-pi · 40 tokens

tool-prompt-optimization

Optimize the description prompts an AI agent reads to learn its built-in tools (the .md files under prompts/tools/). Two halves: (1) measure how much of a prompt is already inferable from the tool's JSON parameter schema + name, to prune redundancy with evidence; (2) house authoring rules for what belongs in a tool…

can1357/oh-my-pi · 0 tokens

semantic-compression

Re-encode verbose prose into a dense telegraphic register — punctuation as connectives, label frames, verbless assertions — without losing normativity or precision. Use when compressing system prompts, tool/function descriptions, skill bodies, or agent instructions; reducing token count or context bloat; making…

can1357/oh-my-pi · 77 tokens

swarm-pr-review

Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 91 tokens

include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl

When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 29 tokens

widen-return-type

When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 9 tokens