Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HsienW/chat-gun-react-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HsienW/chat-gun-react-agent/master/.agents/skills/code-review-and-quality/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HsienW/chat-gun-react-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hsienw/chat-gun-react-agent/code-review-and-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hsienw/chat-gun-react-agent/code-review-and-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hsienw/chat-gun-react-agent/code-review-and-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.03040 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01520 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00608 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00304 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-and-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 348 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7587de5eff9e
code-review-and-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository HsienW/chat-gun-react-agent (133 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,040 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
contribute-to-eliza
Finish and prove a scoped elizaOS GitHub issue, or independently review and repair an open elizaOS pull request. Use when contributing compute to elizaOS by selecting unclaimed work, implementing or reviewing changes, adding real tests and evidence, validating artifacts, or preparing a contribution for maintainer…
ha-code-review
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.
plugin-quality
A review guide for checking Zhin.js plugins before release. It covers plugin structure, feature declarations, resource cleanup, message sending, and security.
code-review
A code-review workflow that sends local changes to a separate reviewer for checks on correctness, style, performance, security, tests, and design.
incident-review
Summarize an incident with timeline, likely cause, impact, and follow-up actions.
code-review-practices
Provides practical guidance for conducting thorough code reviews that identify issues early, promote knowledge sharing, and deliver constructive feedback. This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, establishing team review standards, or mentoring developers on effective review practices.