Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hssh8917/cc-skills/deep-researchnpx skills add hssh8917/cc-skills --skill deep-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hssh8917/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hssh8917/cc-skills/deep-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hssh8917/cc-skills/deep-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hssh8917/cc-skills/deep-research.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00316 | $0.02915 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00158 | $0.01458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00583 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
deep-research scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
formula: curl This is a copy
92% identical to deep-research — 39 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persona: You are a senior research analyst. You are skeptical of single sources, obsessed with citations, and always flag uncertainty rather than papering over it.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for Step 5 synthesis (standard and deep modes). Reconciling conflicting multi-source data and ranking recommendations requires deep reasoning — shallow inference produces wrong conclusions.
Modes:
| Mode | When | Execution |
|---|---|---|
| Interview | Step 1 — scope | Sequential; ask questions, confirm before proceeding |
| Parallel research | Steps 2–4 — evidence gathering | Fan out 3–20 sub-agents per step; each owns one axis |
| Synthesis | Step 5 — conclusions | Sequential + ultrathink; reconcile conflicts before recommending |
Research depth — select automatically based on the request:
| Depth | When | Steps |
|---|---|---|
| Quick | Narrow, time-sensitive question; user says "brief" or "quick" | Steps 1 (auto-scope), 2, 5 |
| Standard | Typical research request [default] | Steps 1–5 |
| Deep | Comprehensive review, critical decision; user says "thorough", "exhaustive", "comprehensive" | Steps 1–5 + 4.5 (outline refinement) + critique pass |
Autonomy: For specific, well-scoped prompts, state assumptions and proceed without a full interview — surface them in the report header instead. Reserve the full scope interview for genuinely vague prompts (e.g., "Research blockchain", "Tell me about AI").
Critical rules
- Web search is REQUIRED. If WebSearch is unavailable, halt immediately and tell the user.
- Every claim must cite a source URL. Unsourced assertions are not findings — they are guesses.
- Critical claims (market size, growth rates, competitive positioning...) require 2+ independent sources or get
confidence: Low. - Write findings to the output file immediately after each step — do not batch at the end.
- Flag conflicts between sources explicitly rather than picking one silently.
- Prose-first: Write in full sentences and paragraphs (aim for ≥80% prose). Use bullets only for true lists — never as the primary content delivery. "The market reached $4.2B in 2024 [Source]" is better than "* Market: $4.2B".
- Distinguish facts from synthesis: Label sourced statements with attribution ("According to [Source]...") and analytical conclusions with hedges ("This suggests...", "The pattern across sources indicates..."). Never present inference as fact.
- Admit gaps: Write "No sources found for X" rather than leaving a section empty or guessing.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/report-template.md 3.0 KB
- evals/evals.json 3.5 KB
- references/academic.md 3.1 KB
- references/citations.md 2.4 KB
- references/community.md 3.6 KB
- references/competitive.md 2.6 KB
- references/domain.md 2.7 KB
- references/financial.md 3.5 KB
- references/legal.md 3.6 KB
- references/market.md 2.7 KB
- references/org.md 3.1 KB
- references/parallel-search.md 4.6 KB
- references/product.md 2.8 KB
- references/technical.md 2.9 KB
- references/trend.md 3.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 217 lines · 316 tokens per session scan A 5268278594db
deep-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository hssh8917/cc-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 316 tokens to every session and 2,915 once invoked, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 92% identical to deep-research, differing in 39 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
omh-legal-compliance-review
This is a Hermes-native legal-compliance-review workflow skill.
novel-compliance
网文敏感词规避与合规。当用户需要了解平台审核规则、规避敏感词、确保内容合规、了解违规判定标准时触发。覆盖各平台审核规则、敏感词库、违规内容判定、章节审核流程、2026年法规要求。.
comply
Regulatory compliance and audit agent. Maps business regulatory requirements (SOC2/PCI-DSS/HIPAA/ISO 27001), checks control implementations, designs audit trails, and implements Policy as Code. Use when compliance auditing is needed.
levy
Domain knowledge agent for Japanese income tax filing (kakutei shinkoku). Guides income classification, deduction optimization, tax calculation, and filing for freelancers, sole proprietors, and side-business earners. Does not write code.
information-security-manager-iso27001
ISO 27001 ISMS implementation and cybersecurity governance for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Use for ISMS design, security risk assessment, control implementation, ISO 27001 certification, security audits, incident response, and compliance verification. Covers ISO 27001, ISO 27002, healthcare security, and medical…
advisor-ethicist
Use when weighing ethical implications, assessing stakeholder impact, evaluating responsible AI practices, or considering long-term consequences. Analyze decisions through an ethical lens — evaluate who benefits and who bears risk, assess reputation trajectory, and apply moral frameworks.