Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/code-health-checknpx skills add huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering --skill code-health-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/code-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/code-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/code-health-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
code-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 77 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 4d2b9e15b0d5
code-health-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering (1,096 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
rubber-duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…
tool-calling-tutor
Use when a tool-calling agent does not call a tool, sends wrong arguments, loops without stopping, or needs a function schema. Guides a four-branch diagnosis and five-step schema repair. Do not use for framework-specific, MCP-server, or production-observability questions.
ai-discover
Parallel discovery of performance hotspots (perf track) and failure surfaces (bug track) for the auto-improvement loop. Fans out one subagent per hot-path area or failure surface; each returns ONE concrete, behavior-preserving fix candidate (perf) or a reproducing test plus fix (bug). Discovery only — no code changes…
debugging-websocket-issues
Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WSERRUNEXPECTEDRSV1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques.
dev-fix
Unified developer workflow for fixing bugs. Analyzes issue-tracker context, cross-checks docs/code, proposes a solution, implements the fix, verifies locally, and delivers a PR/MR.
verify-bug
Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.