Qiushi-Skill is a collection of agent skills that turn dialectical materialist and practical philosophy into methods for investigating problems, identifying their central contradiction, testing conclusions, and continuing work. It is intended to guide AI agents through analysis and task execution. The catalogue entries are its skills, commands, hook, plugin, and agent components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HughYau/qiushi-skill --skill overall-planninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HughYau/qiushi-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/qiushi-skill/overall-planning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/qiushi-skill/overall-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hughyau/qiushi-skill/overall-planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/qiushi-skill/overall-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hughyau/qiushi-skill/overall-planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00216 | $0.00888 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00108 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
overall-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
统筹兼顾
"把国内外一切积极因素调动起来。" —— 《论十大关系》
平衡不是"各方都少一点"的和稀泥，而是让各方面都发挥作用的配置；平衡点随条件变化而动。
用 / 不用
用：
- 多个相互制约的目标要权衡
- 优化一个维度时损害了另一个
- 多个利益相关方要协调
- 发现自己正片面追求某一目标
不用：
- 只有一个目标维度
- 用户已明确取舍方向
- 大方向已定、只需集中推进 →
concentrate-forces - 硬性二选一，没有动态平衡空间 →
contradiction-analysis定性后取舍
操作规程
- 列辩证关系对：本任务中真正存在的对立面（速度↔质量、深度↔广度、短期↔长期、简单↔灵活、探索↔稳定、集中↔分散……），按实际识别，不照搬模板。
- 片面性检查：当前方案是否完全忽略了某一方？是刻意取舍（可接受，写明）还是无意忽略（要纠正）？
- 定当前阶段的平衡点：每对关系一个侧重方向 + 另一方的底线。
- 系统影响检查：加强 A 会对其他关系对造成什么？连锁调整。
- 学他人教训：类似场景里因片面追求而失败的案例是什么？借鉴不照搬。
- 设失衡预警：出现什么信号说明失衡，需要重新平衡。
输出模板
辩证关系：
1. [A] ↔ [B]：目前偏向 [A / B / 均衡]，程度 [轻微 / 明显 / 严重]，属 [刻意取舍 / 无意忽略]
2. ……
平衡方案：
[A] vs [B]：当前阶段优先 [A]，但 [B] 不低于 ……；原因 ……
系统影响：加强 [A] → 对 [C]↔[D]：加剧 / 缓解 / 无影响，需 ……
失衡预警：若出现 ……，说明 [A]↔[B] 失衡，重新调用本 skill
纪律
- 禁止固定折中：平衡点必须与当前阶段条件挂钩。
- 禁止调整一处不看全局。
- 只写真实存在的关系对；凑数的关系对是形式主义。
交接
- 识别关系对本身就是矛盾分析 →
contradiction-analysis - 大方向定了 →
concentrate-forces执行
原著依据：original-texts.md
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -112 lines · +118 tokens per session 32eef00f4d05
- 11d ago First seen · 175 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 3bc48cdbb00d
overall-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository HughYau/qiushi-skill (3,773 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 216 tokens to every session and 888 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pentest-playbook
7-phase pentest pipeline from passive recon to exploitation.
to-issues
A planning aid that breaks a PRD or technical specification into small implementation issues, each covering a complete, demonstrable piece of work.
listenhub-tts
A text-to-speech tool that uses the ListenHub service to turn written text into audio, including short recordings, multi-speaker scripts, and long-form streamed speech.
article-icons
A tool that adds static inline SVG icons from itshover.com to Markdown, HTML, and similar articles.
ship-it
A GitHub workflow for finishing an implemented issue: commit the relevant changes, push a branch, create a pull request, merge it, and close the issue. GitHub is a service for hosting code and reviewing changes, and a pull request is a proposed change for review.
fix-pr-review-loop
Use when the user asks to fix a PR review and drive it to approval autonomously — "fix the PR review and loop until approved", "fix-pr-review-loop", "keep addressing review comments until this PR is approved". Takes an optional PR number/URL (defaults to the current branch's PR). Repeatedly calls fix-pr-review, waits…