Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to huyphan13189/QE-AI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huyphan13189/QE-AI/main/.claude/skills/prompting-for-qe/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huyphan13189/QE-AIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/huyphan13189/qe-ai/prompting-for-qe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huyphan13189/qe-ai/prompting-for-qe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huyphan13189/qe-ai/prompting-for-qe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huyphan13189/qe-ai/prompting-for-qe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huyphan13189/qe-ai/prompting-for-qe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.01339 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00536 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
prompting-for-qe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 6293c938447f
prompting-for-qe is a skill published in the GitHub repository huyphan13189/QE-AI (24 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 1,339 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
promptfoo-evaluation
Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM…
prompt-regression
Use when the user has changed a prompt (system prompt, RAG template, agent instruction, etc.) and wants to know whether the candidate is better or worse than the baseline. Also use when the user mentions prompt A/B testing, prompt comparison, prompt optimization validation, "did my prompt change help," or prompt…
llm-patterns
AI-first application patterns, LLM testing, prompt management.
eval-llm-judge
Write LLM-as-judge evaluator prompts for AI products. Use this skill whenever you need to evaluate semantic properties of AI outputs that cannot be checked programmatically — output quality, tone, factual accuracy, edge case handling, reference alignment. Also use when auditing existing judge prompts for bias…
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.