Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hxy91819/mason-skills --skill story-direction-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hxy91819/mason-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hxy91819/mason-skills/story-direction-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hxy91819/mason-skills/story-direction-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hxy91819/mason-skills/story-direction-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hxy91819/mason-skills/story-direction-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hxy91819/mason-skills/story-direction-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
story-direction-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Story Direction Review
这是流程类 Skill，仅在用户显式调用 $story-direction-review 时运行。large-task-orchestrator 在
需要大局判断（是否插入 Story、是否重规划）时，也会另派线程并在任务里显式调用本 Skill；它的常规
Validator 只逐条核对 Acceptance，不走本 Skill。默认只读；只确认 Story 是否真正完成、方向是否仍
成立。不做代码审查、风格检查或局部重构建议。
建立独立视角
优先由未实现该 Story 的 Validator 执行。先运行 sibling large-task-planning/scripts/epic_story.py brief
取得稳定边界、目标 Story、相关黄金案例与直接前置 Handoff，再读 status --json 了解后续结果与依赖；
有疑点时查看 SPEC.md、原始证据和代码。不要把 STATUS.md 当成 Agent 状态源。
区分四类事实：稳定 Goal 与用户边界、Story 原意、实际交付与证据、新发现的实现假设。
检查方向
- 实际结果是否满足 Story Outcome/Acceptance，还是用局部通过替代了用户结果。
- 新事实是否推翻
agent/plan.json的 Goal、黄金 oracle、边界或后续 Story 前提。 - 黄金案例和纵向结果是否有重大遗漏，
final_story是否仍能闭合全部依赖路径。 - 下一张 Story 是否能凭自身 Context 与前置 Handoff 开工，而无需发明产品决定。
给出唯一结论
CONTINUE：方向和后续前提成立。PATCH：同一 Story 内有明确小遗漏；给出 Worker 可直接使用的修复提示。INSERT_STORY：出现新的独立工程结果；说明插入位置、依赖、验收和最小计划影响。REPLAN：Goal、黄金判据或用户边界失效；列出需要用户决定的一个最小问题。
Validator 不修改文件或状态。若用户另行要求应用结论，由 orchestrator 保留既有 Story ID 和已完成证据；
插入使用 STORY-NN.M；改变 Story Outcome/Acceptance 时递增 intent_version；改变 Goal、黄金判据或
用户边界时先取得用户决定并递增 goal_version。
输出
结论：CONTINUE | PATCH | INSERT_STORY | REPLAN
方向证据：
- <原定结果与实际证据>
- <新事实对后续计划的影响>
- <黄金覆盖或重大遗漏>
计划动作：<无需调整，或最小调整>
下一步提示词：<Worker、orchestrator 或决策人可直接使用的内容>
完成标准：结论唯一、证据可追溯、没有代码审查噪声，下一会话能直接继续或明确停止。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +2 lines 2418b82b539b
- 2d ago Changed · +1 lines 288a92f5f2a1
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines f430d7c9d602
- 8d ago Changed · -10 lines · +5 tokens per session 708acd80b7bf
- 12d ago First seen · 63 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A aa00afc4f418
story-direction-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hxy91819/mason-skills (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
magpie-security-issue-import-from-md
Open one or more tracking issues from a markdown file containing a batch of security findings. Each finding becomes one tracker landing in the Needs triage board column. The file itself is the full report — there is no inbound reporter to reply to and no PR to inspect.