Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills --skill llm-prompt-optimizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/llm-prompt-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/llm-prompt-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/llm-prompt-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/llm-prompt-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/llm-prompt-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
llm-prompt-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to llm-prompt-optimizer — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Prompt Optimizer
Overview
This skill transforms weak, vague, or inconsistent prompts into precision-engineered instructions that reliably produce high-quality outputs from any LLM (Claude, Gemini, GPT-4, Llama, etc.). It applies systematic prompt engineering frameworks — from zero-shot to few-shot, chain-of-thought, and structured output patterns.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when a prompt returns inconsistent, vague, or hallucinated results
- Use when you need structured/JSON output from an LLM reliably
- Use when designing system prompts for AI agents or chatbots
- Use when you want to reduce token usage without sacrificing quality
- Use when implementing chain-of-thought reasoning for complex tasks
- Use when prompts work on one model but fail on another
Step-by-Step Guide
1. Diagnose the Weak Prompt
Before optimizing, identify which problem pattern applies:
| Problem | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Too vague | Generic, unhelpful answers | Add role + context + constraints |
| No structure | Unformatted, hard-to-parse output | Specify output format explicitly |
| Hallucination | Confident wrong answers | Add "say I don't know if unsure" |
| Inconsistent | Different answers each run | Add few-shot examples |
| Too long | Verbose, padded responses | Add length constraints |
2. Apply the RSCIT Framework
Every optimized prompt should have:
- R — Role: Who is the AI in this interaction?
- S — Situation: What context does it need?
- C — Constraints: What are the rules and limits?
- I — Instructions: What exactly should it do?
- T — Template: What should the output look like?
Before (weak prompt):
Explain machine learning.
After (optimized prompt):
You are a senior ML engineer explaining concepts to a junior developer.
Context: The developer has 1 year of Python experience but no ML background.
Task: Explain supervised machine learning in simple terms.
Constraints:
- Use an analogy from everyday life
- Maximum 200 words
- No mathematical formulas
- End with one actionable next step
Format: Plain prose, no bullet points.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 189 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A a14431b1d394
llm-prompt-optimizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,446 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to llm-prompt-optimizer, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
chain-of-thought-prompts
Chain-of-thought and step-by-step reasoning prompts for complex problem solving.
few-shot-example-gen
Few-shot example generation and optimization for improved LLM performance.
llm-classifier
LLM-based zero-shot and few-shot classification for flexible intent detection.
context-optimization
Use when optimizing token usage, KV cache efficiency, or context window management for LLM agents. Keywords: context optimization, KV cache, prompt caching, token budget, semantic pruning, lost-in-the-middle.
prompt-engineering
Use when designing, optimizing, testing, or deploying robust prompt systems for AI agents. This skill provides frameworks for structured prompt engineering, meta-prompting, and automated optimization workflows.
extended-thinking
Use Claude's extended thinking (reasoning) mode effectively — budget tokens, interleaved thinking with tool use, when it helps, when it wastes tokens, and how to inspect the thinking trace. Use this skill when building reasoning-heavy features (math, code generation, multi-step planning), debugging why a model is…