Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hyperb1iss/hyperskills/researchnpx skills add hyperb1iss/hyperskills --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hyperb1iss/hyperskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hyperb1iss/hyperskills/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hyperb1iss/hyperskills/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hyperb1iss/hyperskills/research.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00071 | $0.03873 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01937 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00775 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00387 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 309 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-Agent Research
Wave-based knowledge gathering with deferred synthesis. Mined from 300+ real research dispatches: the pattern that consistently produces actionable intelligence.
Core insight: Research breadth-first, synthesize after. Conclusions drawn from the first three results miss nuance the fourth wave would have surfaced. Deploying agents in waves and accumulating findings before synthesizing produces sharper recommendations.
How to read this skill: calibrate to the question, not the framework. Most research is Quick Mode or one wave plus targeted follow-ups; only deep dives need the full pattern. The Phase 1 budget table sizes it.
The Shape
digraph research {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box];
"1. PRIME" [style=filled, fillcolor="#e8e8ff"];
"2. WAVE 1: Broad Sweep" [style=filled, fillcolor="#ffe8e8"];
"3. GAP ANALYSIS" [style=filled, fillcolor="#fff8e0"];
"4. WAVE 2+: Targeted" [style=filled, fillcolor="#ffe8e8"];
"5. SYNTHESIZE" [style=filled, fillcolor="#e8ffe8"];
"6. DECIDE & RECORD" [style=filled, fillcolor="#e8e8ff"];
"1. PRIME" -> "2. WAVE 1: Broad Sweep";
"2. WAVE 1: Broad Sweep" -> "3. GAP ANALYSIS";
"3. GAP ANALYSIS" -> "4. WAVE 2+: Targeted";
"4. WAVE 2+: Targeted" -> "3. GAP ANALYSIS" [label="still gaps", style=dashed];
"3. GAP ANALYSIS" -> "5. SYNTHESIZE" [label="coverage sufficient"];
"5. SYNTHESIZE" -> "6. DECIDE & RECORD";
}
Phase 1: PRIME
Lean on existing knowledge before spawning agents. Re-running research that already lives in Sibyl burns tokens and produces duplicate entries.
Common moves
- Search Sibyl first:
sibyl search "<research topic>",sibyl search "<related technology>",sibyl search "<prior decision in this area>". Surface what's already known before generating new findings. - Check for staleness. Fast-moving topics (frameworks, models, cloud services) usually warrant re-research even when Sibyl has recent entries; treat the existing knowledge as a baseline. Stable topics with recent entries often don't need a fresh pass at all. One class is never exempt: version, "latest", and SOTA facts expire no matter how recent the entry feels. Recalled memory routes the investigation, live state decides. Re-verify those against the primary source before they drive a dispatch or a recommendation. Same rot law for prior research docs: anything older than the reality it describes gets a per-claim liveness check against live sources and current code before it shapes a decision.
- Premise-check the target. Confirm the data, repo, or question actually exists (and disambiguate which one) before any agent launches. A wave pointed at a wrong or empty target manufactures findings.
- Sharpen the research question. "Research databases" is too vague to dispatch on. "Compare PostgreSQL vs CockroachDB for multi-region write-heavy workloads with <10ms p99 latency" gives agents enough scope to do useful work.
- Calibrate the research budget to the decision the research is feeding:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 309 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 959093a2cdd5
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository hyperb1iss/hyperskills (31 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,873 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude-md-improver
Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files in repositories. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix CLAUDE.md files. Scans for all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against templates, outputs quality report, then makes targeted updates. Also use when the user mentions "CLAUDE.md maintenance" or "project…
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
Use when evaluating A-share limit-up (涨停板) setups through Chen Hao's sentiment and momentum lens: market emotion cycles, board strength, follow-through, and short-term aggressive momentum trading.
comet-github
将 Comet GitHub 维护请求路由到基于证据的 PR 审阅、Issue 分诊、本地想法收集、CI 诊断或 Issue 实施流程。用户提到 Comet GitHub Issue/PR 但未指定流程,或询问下一步如何处理时使用。.