Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/main/.claude/skills/review-changes/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iamadi11/mcp-ui-pocWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/review-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/review-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc/review-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00204 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review changes
Cross-check with docs/AI_WORKFLOW.md (security, architecture, testing).
Steps
- Scope — Diff matches stated goal; no unrelated files.
- Boundaries —
server/vsclient/; no cross-leakage of concerns. - Secrets — No
.env, keys, or tokens in source or logs. - Quality — Client:
npm run lintclean for touched files; server: sensible error handling. - Docs —
README.mdupdated if APIs or setup changed. - Risk — Note breaking changes and rollback for reviewers.
Checklist
- Testing/validation steps from the author are credible.
- MCP/browser flows still work if MCP UI paths changed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 23 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 10b898d75ecf
review-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository iamadi11/mcp-ui-poc (8 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 204 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.