Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add iamakbarsha1/whetstone --skill findings-list-is-not-a-todo-listgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iamakbarsha1/whetstoneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.00885 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 75 lines · 119 tokens per session scan A e7ea1f17c5ca
findings-list-is-not-a-todo-list is a skill published in the GitHub repository iamakbarsha1/whetstone (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed CC-BY-4.0. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 885 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
lean-audit
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like lean-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat"…
lean-review
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this…
discount-review
Inspect the discount policy fixture with a repeatable review checklist and helper script.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
deep-review
Parallel competency-based code review. Launches independent Agent reviewers per competency (security, performance, architecture, database, concurrency, error-handling, frontend, testing), each with a focused checklist and isolated context. Synthesizes findings into unified report with FIX/DEFER/ACCEPT triage. Use…
architecture-quality
Keep web applications, APIs and services readable as they grow: choose feature or domain seams, assign state ownership, enforce dependency direction, keep adapters thin, and verify file shape. Use when starting or extending a web app, backend, frontend, API or multi-page product; when a change makes a module hard to…