Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add iamakbarsha1/whetstone --skill prove-the-test-can-failgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iamakbarsha1/whetstoneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/prove-the-test-can-fail)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/prove-the-test-can-fail"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/prove-the-test-can-fail/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/prove-the-test-can-fail"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iamakbarsha1/whetstone/prove-the-test-can-fail.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00106 | $0.01058 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00529 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
prove-the-test-can-fail scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 84 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A 86c603f775fc
prove-the-test-can-fail is a skill published in the GitHub repository iamakbarsha1/whetstone (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed CC-BY-4.0. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 1,058 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-gen
Generate test cases from type constraints and specs. Creates boundary tests, edge cases, and fixtures automatically. Pact-lang inspired. Triggers on: generate tests, test from spec, create fixtures, boundary tests.
generate-tests
Auto-generate Jest/Vitest test files with intelligent coverage and mock detection.
tdd-workflow
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
cpp-testing
Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.