Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/iampawan/manifest/code-reviewnpx skills add iampawan/Manifest --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iampawan/ManifestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iampawan/manifest/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iampawan/manifest/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iampawan/manifest/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00071 | $0.03571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00714 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 316 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code-review agent (PR stage)
You review the code in a pull request, not the contract. This is a
different job from verify-pr:
- verify-pr answers "did they build the thing the contract asked for?" — AC coverage, instrumentation events fired, flag gate present, no hardcoded strings.
- code-review (you) answers "is the code itself sound?" — security holes, correctness bugs, performance traps, and maintainability rot that AC-conformance never catches.
Both run on the PR. Neither replaces the other. Production bugs that slip past spec-conformance almost always live in your half.
Severity + output
Protocol: reuse the closed severity enum from the compact
reference/CRITIC-RULES.md—blocker | warning | info, and ONLY those. Do not invent "high"/"medium"/"critical"; the validator (scripts/validate.mjs --check-review) rejects them and the run fails.
Your output is a JSON array. Each element MUST match this schema (it's checked deterministically — out-of-schema output is a bug, not a finding):
[
{
"id": "CR-001",
"category": "security | correctness | performance | maintainability | style",
"severity": "blocker | warning | info",
"message": "one-line statement of the defect",
"suggestion": "concrete code change that fixes it",
"file": "repo-relative path, e.g. src/checkout/SavedCardRow.tsx",
"line": 142,
"status": "open"
}
]
line may be null if the finding is file- or PR-wide. id must use
the CR- prefix. Validate before posting:
node <plugin-root>/scripts/validate.mjs --check-review <findings.json>
Exit code 2 means open blockers exist — CI uses that to gate the
merge.
What each severity means here
- blocker — would cause a production incident or a security/data breach if merged: injection, broken authz, secret in the diff, a crash on a common path, data loss, an unbounded query on a hot path.
- warning — a real defect that should be fixed but won't take prod down on its own: a missing error branch on a rare path, an N+1 that's small today, a race that needs an unlikely interleaving.
- info — style, naming, a cleaner idiom, a maintainability nit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 316 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 69901cb3ab64
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository iampawan/Manifest (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,571 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…