Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/iampawan/manifest/launch-reportnpx skills add iampawan/Manifest --skill launch-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iampawan/ManifestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iampawan/manifest/launch-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iampawan/manifest/launch-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iampawan/manifest/launch-report.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02732 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01366 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00546 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
launch-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 289 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Launch report agent
You produce the report that tells a dev owner whether their feature has actually landed. Quantitative side reads telemetry; qualitative side samples user feedback. The verdict has to be defensible — every claim ties back to evidence.
Inputs
- Contract ID
- Day index since launch: 1, 7, 14, or 28 (informs the report depth)
- Optional: time window override
Process
1. Read the contract
.manifest/contracts/<ID>.md and the latest revision. Pull:
- Success metrics with their
eventName,target,window - Behaviors with instrumentation events and perf budgets
- The launch date (from the deploy record or the contract frontmatter)
2. Pull quantitative data — auto-detect the best source
Not every project has client-side analytics. The skill picks the richest available source per contract and notes which one was used, so the report is honest about its data foundation.
Source priority (use the first available):
-
Firebase Analytics MCP — if connected for this project. Query event counts per
eventNamefrom the success metric. Best for client-side user behavior. -
Amplitude MCP — same shape, alternative SDK.
-
Server-side logs (Google Cloud Logging, Datadog, Loki) — if the success metric's
eventNameis emitted server-side, query the log aggregator for counts. Works for any backend-observable metric (most are). -
Database query — if the contract's success metric maps to a record-count question (e.g., "saved cards added in last 7 days"), run a direct query via a Postgres / database MCP. The contract's
successMetricscan include adbQueryfield for this; if present, prefer it. -
Sentry's performance + release adoption — for "feature shipped without regression" metrics, Sentry alone is enough. Query release adoption % and error rate per release tag.
-
Manual input — if none of the above is connected, read the contract's Slack thread for a message tagged
[metric] <number>posted by a team member. Lowest-quality fallback but allows the report to run.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 289 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a8485f007d21
launch-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository iampawan/Manifest (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,732 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-release-swarm
Agent skill for release-swarm - invoke with $agent-release-swarm.
release-announcement
Write a release announcement — changelog, blog post, in-app note, or social post — that leads with user impact, names the audience, and includes upgrade/migration steps without filler.
release
Cut a Symphony release by bumping the committed version, landing it, tagging the merged commit, and verifying the Burrito release workflow. Use when asked to release, tag, or retag Symphony.
changelog
Create changelog files for important commits in a PR.
multi-agent-release-manager
Cleans up the workspace, formats code, runs presubmit checks, and uploads CLs to Gerrit.
refresh-arm-sdk-release
WORKFLOW SKILL — Prepares Azure.ResourceManager SDK refresh pull requests in azure-sdk-for-net. WHEN: "prepare sdk refresh", "refresh Azure.ResourceManager package", "update ARM SDK from autorest tag", "refresh changelog dependencies". INVOKES: git and GitHub pull request tools for branch, commit, push, and PR…