A tool for performing a comprehensive review of code.

Use it when you need a broad code review rather than a review limited to one specified change.

It helps identify issues in a codebase before changes are accepted or released.

code-review — Skill for Claude Code and Codex by IAPro-Community

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add IAPro-Community/Orquestrador-Maestro --skill code-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IAPro-Community/Orquestrador-Maestro

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iapro-community/orquestrador-maestro/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 8 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,542 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits

NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026

How audits are shown

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00008	$0.01542
Opus 5.5	$0.00003	$0.00617
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00002	$0.00308
Haiku 4.5	$0.00001	$0.00154

Measured 1mo ago against content hash eeb809a868bb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

codex/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 225 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Conduct a thorough code review for quality, security, and maintainability with severity-rated feedback.

When to Use

This skill activates when:

User requests "review this code", "code review"
Before merging a pull request
After implementing a major feature
User wants quality assessment

What It Does

GPT-5.4 Guidance Alignment

Default to concise, evidence-dense progress and completion reporting unless the user or risk level requires more detail.
Treat newer user task updates as local overrides for the active workflow branch while preserving earlier non-conflicting constraints.
If correctness depends on additional inspection, retrieval, execution, or verification, keep using the relevant tools until the review is grounded.
Continue through clear, low-risk, reversible next steps automatically; ask only when the next step is materially branching, destructive, or preference-dependent.

Delegates to the code-reviewer agent (THOROUGH tier) for deep analysis:

Identify Changes
- Run git diff to find changed files
- Determine scope of review (specific files or entire PR)
Review Categories
- Security - Hardcoded secrets, injection risks, XSS, CSRF
- Code Quality - Function size, complexity, nesting depth
- Performance - Algorithm efficiency, N+1 queries, caching
- Best Practices - Naming, documentation, error handling
- Maintainability - Duplication, coupling, testability
Severity Rating
- CRITICAL - Security vulnerability (must fix before merge)
- HIGH - Bug or major code smell (should fix before merge)
- MEDIUM - Minor issue (fix when possible)
- LOW - Style/suggestion (consider fixing)
Specific Recommendations
- File:line locations for each issue
- Concrete fix suggestions
- Code examples where applicable

Agent Delegation

delegate(
  role="code-reviewer",
  tier="THOROUGH",
  prompt="CODE REVIEW TASK

Review code changes for quality, security, and maintainability.

Scope: [git diff or specific files]

Review Checklist:
- Security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10)
- Code quality (complexity, duplication)
- Performance issues (N+1, inefficient algorithms)
- Best practices (naming, documentation, error handling)
- Maintainability (coupling, testability)

Output: Code review report with:
- Files reviewed count
- Issues by severity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
- Specific file:line locations
- Fix recommendations
- Approval recommendation (APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES / COMMENT)"
)

Read the full file on GitHub · 225 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

1mo ago First seen · 225 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A eeb809a868bb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository IAPro-Community/Orquestrador-Maestro (62 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 1,542 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Claude Code Code review agent-orchestration ai-agents ai-workflows automation codex

agy-delegate

Delegate coding tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills · 35 tokens

supervisor

Autonomous multi-agent quality supervisor and release gate. Use when a user wants the best possible result, asks for rigorous review, or when a substantive answer/deliverable should be challenged before release. Decomposes the task, fans out independent subagents, uses specialist and adversarial judges, verifies…

ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-plugin · 92 tokens

code-review