Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor --skill loop-plan-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/loop-plan-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/loop-plan-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/loop-plan-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/loop-plan-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/loop-plan-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.02617 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.01047 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00523 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
loop-plan-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 363 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A f836b4bbc347
loop-plan-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor (380 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,617 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-team
A multi-reviewer code review process that checks a change from several specialist viewpoints and combines the results into one report. It can cover bugs, security, tests, dependencies, frontend behavior, and continuous-integration workflows.
ultra
Fans the work out as a fleet of parallel Codex, Grok, and Cursor agents billed to their own subscriptions, then synthesizes one result. The peer engine equivalent of ultracode, adding intensity without spending Claude quota on the fleet. Use it for genuinely broad goals, not only explicit asks for intensity.
panel
Convenes a blind Codex and Grok panel on one neutral brief, seats a Cursor diversity track for a missing one, and adjudicates the verdicts.
grok-prompting
Brief writing guidance for composing self contained Grok briefs for coding, review, diagnosis, and second opinion tasks.
grok-result-handling
Internal guidance for presenting Grok companion output back to the user.
cursor-result-handling
Internal guidance for presenting Cursor companion output back to the user.