Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Icarus603/claude-code --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Icarus603/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/icarus603/claude-code/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icarus603/claude-code/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icarus603/claude-code/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icarus603/claude-code/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icarus603/claude-code/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00003 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00000 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 2 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 74daeff84960
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository Icarus603/claude-code (27 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cafleet
Interact with the CAFleet message broker and supervise CAFleet member teams. Use when an agent needs to register as a member, send/receive messages, poll inbox, acknowledge messages, or discover other members; or when a Director is about to spawn, monitor, health-check, or recover a stalled team of CAFleet members…
cafleet-design-doc
Use when the user asks to create a design doc, design document, specification, or technical spec (create workflow → Director/Drafter/Reviewer team); to validate, review, or interview an existing design doc through multi-round Q&A (interview workflow); or to implement or execute a design doc (execute workflow → TDD…
prose-critique
Adversarial reading methodology for narrative fiction: find what doesn't work, not confirm what does. Focus-area driven with dedicated resources per area. Use when reviewing drafts, evaluating prose quality, or assessing changes at any stage.
research-depth-control
Use this skill when autoresearchteam needs deeper literature coverage, more citations in paper writing, stronger related-work synthesis, or a gate that prevents shallow research from reaching ideation or LaTeX.
literature-evidence-mapping
Use this skill when discovering papers, mapping related work, reading papers deeply, checking citations, or building evidence cards for an auto research task.
media-asset-sourcing
Use this skill when PPT slides need external images, screenshots, logos, product photos, stock-like visuals, diagrams, or videos that must be downloaded, inserted, or linked with source and rights tracking.