Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add icohangar-ops/agent-conductor --skill safe-autonomous-rungit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/icohangar-ops/agent-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/icohangar-ops/agent-conductor/safe-autonomous-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icohangar-ops/agent-conductor/safe-autonomous-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icohangar-ops/agent-conductor/safe-autonomous-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icohangar-ops/agent-conductor/safe-autonomous-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icohangar-ops/agent-conductor/safe-autonomous-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00396 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
safe-autonomous-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Safe autonomous run
Drive a Conductor-bounded loop. The controller — not the model — decides when spend stops.
Steps
run_preflightwith the system rules, history, tool schemas, and user prompt. Treat the USD figure as approximate (ceil(chars/4)).run_beginwithpathpointing at this example (or pass explicitrunUsd/tenantDayUsd). A missing mandate is a HALT.- For each model turn:
run_authorize(kind=model) → perform the call only on PASS →run_commitwith actual tokens/USD if the provider reported them. - For
Bash(high-impact): expectAPPROVE_REQUIRED. An operator runsdecision_gate/run_approvewith solvable, scoped, valid, worth_it before the next authorize. - On HALT (
run_ceiling,tenant_day_ceiling,stuck_loop,kill_switch,hard_stop) stop. Do not invent a new run id to bypass the ceiling. run_killat any time aborts further authorizes without asking the model.
Constraints
- Never call
run_commitwithout a clearance id fromrun_authorize. - Never raise
maxModelClassafter a HALT to "finish the task".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 5a48b71398bb
safe-autonomous-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository icohangar-ops/agent-conductor (0 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 396 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
conducting-cyber-risk-assessment-with-nist-800-30
Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk…
testrail-qa
Work with TestRail through the TestRail MCP Server — find where cases live, write schema-valid test cases, build targeted test runs, triage failures, and report results by case ID. Use when the user mentions TestRail, test cases (C123), test runs, test results, regression suites, or QA coverage.
usage-reporter
Report the token usage of a build to PAPI from your AI client's own local transcript. Optional. Use when completing a build and you want tokens recorded, or when asked what a task or stage cost in tokens. Reads only numeric usage, never prompts or responses.
repo-context
Use repo-context-mcp tools to map, search, and pack repository context before large edits or PR review.
papi-build
Invoke when executing a build via buildexecute. Covers branching, gestalt pre-build check, and post-build audit.
pdf-invoice-extractor
Extract typed invoice data from supplied text, Markdown, or a PDF/image through processdocument. Use for invoice totals, line items, due dates, and extraction anomalies.