Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill refactor-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/igmarin/rails-agent-skills/refactor-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igmarin/rails-agent-skills/refactor-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igmarin/rails-agent-skills/refactor-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igmarin/rails-agent-skills/refactor-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igmarin/rails-agent-skills/refactor-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01118 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor Code
Use this skill when the task is to change structure without changing intended behavior.
Core principle: Small, reversible steps over large rewrites. Separate design improvement from behavior change.
Quick Reference
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Define stable behavior | Written statement of what must not change |
| 2 | Add characterization tests | Tests pass on current code |
| 3 | Choose smallest safe slice | One boundary at a time |
| 4 | Rename, move, or extract | Tests still pass |
| 5 | Remove compatibility shims | Tests still pass, new path proven |
HARD-GATE
NO REFACTORING WITHOUT CHARACTERIZATION TESTS FIRST.
NEVER mix behavior changes with structural refactors in the same step —
if behavior changes are also needed, complete the structural refactor first,
then apply behavior changes in a separate step with its own test.
ONE boundary per refactoring step — never extract two abstractions in the same step.
If a public interface changes, document the compatibility shim and its removal condition.
NEVER fabricate test output — label only actual run output as Observed output.
Core Process
1. Define stable behavior
Identify the exact inputs and outputs of the logic being refactored. Keep public interfaces stable until callers are migrated. Prefer adapters, facades, or wrappers for transitional states.
Include in your output:
- Stable behavior statement: an explicit statement of what must not change (inputs/outputs, public interfaces).
- Shim decision: name any transitional adapter/facade/wrapper and its removal condition, or state why none is needed.
2. Add characterization tests
Write this before touching any production file. No refactoring step begins until this test exists and passes on the current (un-refactored) code. If the characterization spec fails, do not continue — stop and fix the test or the behavior mismatch.
# spec/requests/orders_spec.rb (or service/model spec — mirror the file being refactored)
# frozen_string_literal: true
RSpec.describe "Orders#create current behavior", type: :request do
describe "POST /orders" do
let(:valid_params) { { order: { product_id: 1, quantity: 2 } } }
it "creates order and enqueues warehouse notification" do
expect { post orders_path, params: valid_params }
.to change(Order, :count).by(1)
expect(NotifyWarehouseJob).to have_been_enqueued
end
end
end
Run it: bundle exec rspec spec/requests/orders_spec.rb — it must pass on the current code.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed · -1 lines cbec43590df9
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 1aca1588cde7
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A e99ee06bb605
refactor-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository igmarin/rails-agent-skills (28 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,118 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
platform-apex-generate
Primary Apex authoring skill for class generation, refactoring, and review. ALWAYS ACTIVATE when the user mentions Apex, .cls, triggers, or asks to create/refactor a class (service, selector, domain, batch, queueable, schedulable, invocable, DTO, utility, interface, abstract, exception, REST resource). Use this skill…
flow-next-impl-review
Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.
flow-next-resolve-pr
Resolve PR review feedback. Fetches unresolved threads, triages, fixes, replies and resolves via GraphQL. Use when asked to address review comments.
api-contract-review
Use when auditing CloudBase cloud API wrappers, MCP tools, generated action metadata, or related docs for outdated or incorrect action names, parameters, casing, request shapes, or missing contract tests, especially during periodic quality review or before preparing corrective PRs.
ring:migrating-to-lib-observability
Migrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and…
ring:mapping-streaming-events
Mapping the eventable points in a Lerian Go service where lib-streaming should emit past-tense, durable, tenant-scoped business events, producing a PM-validated event catalog and instrumentation-map.json for ring:instrumenting-streaming-events. Three-pass discovery (Survey, Slice, Mark) with a scope fence and delivery…