cto-red-team-scorecard

cto-red-team-scorecard is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from igor-elbert/ctobot. It costs 56 tokens per session (1,755 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review checklist for testing whether an automated chief technology officer can handle real leadership challenges. It compares the agent's guidance with problems such as missing information, weak delegation, stakeholder conflict, and incomplete execution records.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to evaluate an agentic CTO against an external challenge list, leadership guide, or internal operating manual. It produces a concise scorecard with failure modes, missing artifacts, severity, and coverage.
Why use it?
It exposes gaps that may be hidden by a convincing strategy document. The result separates what is covered from what could still fail in practice and rates each area as pass, partial pass, or fail.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to evaluate an agentic CTO against an external challenge list, leadership guide, or internal operating manual. It produces a concise scorecard with failure modes, missing artifacts, severity, and coverage.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add igor-elbert/ctobot --skill cto-red-team-scorecard
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/igor-elbert/ctobot

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cto-red-team-scorecard

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cto-red-team-scorecard

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igor-elbert/ctobot/cto-red-team-scorecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,755 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.01755
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00877
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00351
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00176

Measured 12d ago against content hash 0ddf4a58ba6c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cto-red-team-scorecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/red-teaming/cto-red-team-scorecard/SKILL.md · 187 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

CTO Red-Team Scorecard

Overview

Use this skill to stress-test an agentic CTO against a set of real-world leadership challenges. The goal is not to praise the operating manual or repeat its principles. The goal is to expose where the CTO would likely fail in practice: missing data, weak delegation, incomplete change management, poor stakeholder handling, or vague execution artifacts.

The output should be a concise audit artifact that separates coverage from execution risk:

  • what the docs already cover
  • what would still fail in practice
  • what artifact or behavior is missing
  • how severe the gap is
  • whether the challenge is a pass, partial pass, or fail

This is especially useful for:

  • new-CTO challenge lists from blogs, interviews, or leadership playbooks
  • internal stress tests of AGENTS.md / SOUL.md style operating manuals
  • comparing an “answering” CTO doc against the messy realities of execution

When to Use

Use when:

  • the user asks whether an agentic CTO would survive a set of external CTO challenges
  • you need to turn a leadership article into a structured critique
  • you want to identify practical gaps in strategy docs, not rewrite them
  • the user asks for a red-team audit, stress test, or failure-mode analysis of CTO guidance

Do not use for:

  • ordinary CTO advice with no evaluation component
  • generic roadmap planning
  • building operational templates unless the templates are explicitly the requested output

Workflow

  1. Gather the challenge set.
    • Prefer a named source article if provided by the user.
    • If the user says “or any others you find online,” collect a small, diverse sample of similar external sources.
    • Ignore vendor pitches, product comparisons, and solution sales pages.
    • If the source is a PDF and direct download / remote navigation fails, try a local copy (e.g. file:///...pdf) in the browser viewer and extract page-by-page with thumbnails/page navigation.
    • When summarizing a source-backed recommendation, include the source explicitly in the output (for example, "Reference: McKinsey, ...") so the comparison is auditable.
    • If a PDF viewer renders but text extraction is empty, use visual page reads (browser vision) and page thumbnails instead of assuming the doc is unreadable.

Read the full file on GitHub · 187 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 187 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 0ddf4a58ba6c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cto-red-team-scorecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository igor-elbert/ctobot (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,755 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens