Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGatenpx agentmods add skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedbackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igorganapolsky/thumbgate/thumbgate-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00127 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
thumbgate-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Amp ThumbGate Skill
On explicit user feedback:
node .claude/scripts/feedback/capture-feedback.js --feedback=up --context="..." --tags="..."
node .claude/scripts/feedback/capture-feedback.js --feedback=down --context="..." --tags="..."
Do not claim promotion from a bare thumbs up/down. Ask for one sentence describing what worked or failed first.
Before major implementation:
npm run feedback:summary
npm run feedback:rules
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 23 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 6e573cef253f
thumbgate-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate (26 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 127 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agentguard
Runtime guardrails for AI coding agents. Stop loops, budget overruns, retry storms, and timeouts before they burn money. Zero dependencies, local-first, MIT licensed.
crm-pipeline-playbook
How to answer pipeline, renewal, and account-health questions using the CRM tools.
deciding-who-decides
Decides who holds authority for a change — the agent at the edge or a human gate — by matching decision rights to reversibility, evidence, and consequence, and names the escalation trigger. Use when an agent could act on something irreversible, trust-bearing, or thinly evidenced. Do not use for trivial reversible…
staying-on-mission
Tests the current work against a written, lasting mission anchor and forces one choice, re-anchor, escalate, or stop. Use when an agent keeps finishing tasks but the work drifts from the goal, scope creeps, the same action repeats in a loop, or standards slip one small step at a time. Do not use for a tiny edit with…
verifying-final-artifacts
Verifies the delivered artifact a consumer actually receives (a figure, chart, PDF, SVG, screenshot, compiled build, or deployed response) by regenerating it fresh and directly observing the output, not the source that produces it, and ends in one honest verdict. Use when the deliverable is a produced artifact and…
closing-stale-packets
Brings an abandoned or half-filled change packet to an honest terminal state by completing it, closing it with a recorded rationale, or deleting it. Use when ng status flags a scaffold or invalid packet, a long session left a draft behind, or work was abandoned mid-packet. Do not use for an actively in-progress…