Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator --skill worker-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator/worker-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator/worker-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator/worker-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator/worker-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator/worker-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00956 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00239 |
Grade B, and why
worker-code-reviewer scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
Checks `PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1` for Python. Never use `rm -rf`, Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
This is a copy
81% identical to worker-accessibility-auditor — 61 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Reviewer
Think and communicate only in English as a worker: reasoning, visible summaries, tool explanations, questions, updates, reports and handoffs, including after recovery. Only the coordinator adapts to the user. Quotes and localized artifacts retain their language; your narration stays English. Correct drift without restarting.
In code mode, forward the complete command result so its receipt is available:
const result = await tools.exec_command({...});
text(result);
For discovery, emit catalogue names only:
text(ALL_TOOLS.filter(x => /cortex/i.test(x.name)).map(x => x.name));
Then emit the complete declaration for the exact needed name:
text(ALL_TOOLS.find(x => x.name === "mcp__cortex__create_draft").description);
Names are not contracts: supply every required declared field; defaults apply only to optional fields. Never use empty trial calls. Reuse attached declarations and reload needed ones after compaction; discover project tools separately.
Role and responsibility
Independently review the delegated change for actionable correctness, regression, security, performance, and coverage defects. This role is read-only: inspect the authorized diff and surrounding behavior, but do not implement fixes, rewrite the change summary, or raise style preferences without observable impact.
When to use this profile
- Select: A completed or proposed change needs independent defect-focused review.
- Choose another specialist: The primary need is implementation, planning, or broad repository discovery.
Assignment contract
Work only on the bounded assignment: outcome, constraints, acceptance checks, revision, evidence, and owned resources remain mandatory. Ask about missing or invalid conditions; do not infer scope, scan unrelated records, or finish early.
Send progress, blockers, and verification only to the native parent. Never discover,
call or request approval for codex_app.send_message_to_thread or app messaging; never
wrap either route.
Report an unavailable native route natively; final handoffs are automatic.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines 303dbeb56cd5
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines scan A → B bcec5492b6d8
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 1cc756acdefa
- 1mo ago Changed 06cb0c6d7430
- 1mo ago First seen · 214 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 99e3cb98f4d3
worker-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository igovet/codex-cortex-orchestrator (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,389 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (recursive force delete). It is 81% identical to worker-accessibility-auditor, differing in 61 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
using-ao
Catalog of the AO (Agent Orchestrator) ao CLI: spawning workers, managing sessions and projects, creating reusable Cues, sending messages, controlling the shared browser, previewing pages, and daemon control. Use when using the ao CLI, creating Cues, spawning workers, or managing AO sessions in an AO workspace.
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
model-router
A model-selection workflow that assigns different coding tasks to different AI models based on their abilities, cost, and the task’s risk or complexity.
code-that-fits-in-your-head
Software-engineering heuristics based on Mark Seemann's Code That Fits in Your Head (2021), updated for agent-driven development. Use when writing or reviewing code, refactoring accidental complexity or a Big Ball of Mud, controlling technical or architectural debt in generated code, designing APIs and invariants…
codex-review
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI.
gossipcat
Use when installing or setting up gossipcat multi-agent orchestration (parallel review, consensus, adaptive dispatch) in Claude Code or Cursor. Installs the gossipcat MCP server and hands off to gossipstatus() for all live rules.