Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ihatesea69/HieuNghi-AI-Skills --skill wp-interactivity-apigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihatesea69/HieuNghi-AI-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ihatesea69/hieunghi-ai-skills/wp-interactivity-api)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ihatesea69/hieunghi-ai-skills/wp-interactivity-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ihatesea69/hieunghi-ai-skills/wp-interactivity-api/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ihatesea69/hieunghi-ai-skills/wp-interactivity-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ihatesea69/hieunghi-ai-skills/wp-interactivity-api.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00572 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
wp-interactivity-api scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to wp-interactivity-api — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WP Interactivity API
When to use
Use this skill when the user mentions:
- Interactivity API,
@wordpress/interactivity, data-wp-interactive,data-wp-on--*,data-wp-bind--*,data-wp-context,- block
viewScriptModule/ module-based view scripts, - hydration issues or “directives don’t fire”.
Inputs required
- Repo root + triage output (
wp-project-triage). - Which block/theme/plugin surfaces are affected (frontend, editor, both).
- Any constraints: WP version, whether modules are supported in the build.
Procedure
1) Detect existing usage + integration style
Search for:
data-wp-interactive@wordpress/interactivityviewScriptModule
Decide:
- Is this a block providing interactivity via
block.jsonview script module? - Is this theme-level interactivity?
- Is this plugin-side “enhance existing markup” usage?
If you’re creating a new interactive block (not just debugging), prefer the official scaffold template:
@wordpress/create-block-interactive-template(via@wordpress/create-block)
2) Identify the store(s)
Locate store definitions and confirm:
- state shape,
- actions (mutations),
- callbacks/event handlers used by
data-wp-on--*.
3) Server-side rendering (best practice)
Pre-render HTML on the server before outputting to ensure:
- Correct initial state in the HTML before JavaScript loads (no layout shift).
- SEO benefits and faster perceived load time.
- Seamless hydration when the client-side JavaScript takes over.
Enable server directive processing
For components using block.json, add supports.interactivity:
{
"supports": {
"interactivity": true
}
}
For themes/plugins without block.json, use wp_interactivity_process_directives() to process directives.
Initialize state/context in PHP
Use wp_interactivity_state() to define initial global state:
wp_interactivity_state( 'myPlugin', array(
'items' => array( 'Apple', 'Banana', 'Cherry' ),
'hasItems' => true,
));
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 180 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7d21134c676d
wp-interactivity-api is a skill published in the GitHub repository ihatesea69/HieuNghi-AI-Skills (3 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to wp-interactivity-api, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
trace-and-isolate
Applies systematic tracing and isolation techniques to pinpoint exactly where a bug originates in code. Use when a bug is hard to locate, code is not working as expected, an error or crash appears with unclear cause, a regression was introduced between recent commits, or you need to narrow down which component…
parallel-investigation
Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist…
hypothesis-testing
Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or…
root-cause-analysis
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not…
workflows-doctor
Diagnose Zapier Workflows skill and SDK CLI compatibility. Use when a workflow skill asks for a compatibility check, when SDK commands or flags are missing, when a workflow skill may be stale, or when updating workflow skills after an SDK CLI change.
sf-debug
Debug and troubleshoot Salesforce applications using debug logs, governor limit monitoring, error diagnosis, and performance profiling. Use when analyzing debug logs, diagnosing governor limit violations, interpreting stack traces, resolving common Salesforce errors, or profiling Apex performance. Activate on .log…