Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ijust/intent-planner --skill intent-validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ijust/intent-plannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.15728 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.06291 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.03146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01573 |
Grade A, and why
intent-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 257 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
intent-validate Skill
Core Mission
- Success Criteria:
- intent-tree, intent-compass, and packets (+ the export draft) are cross-checked, applying all checks in the check catalog (the set of checks, their categories, and their severities are authoritatively defined by the table in
rules/validate-checks.md) - Findings are classified by severity (must-fix / recommended / info), and every item carries its check ID (the ID column of the table in
rules/validate-checks.md), its evidence (file and the relevant statement), and a fix proposal (the skill to re-run or the fix direction) - Unverified targets (missing / unfilled deliverables, plus the IDs of skipped checks) are stated explicitly together with the reason
- Packets are read statically from the four PBR perspectives (user / operations / test / maintenance), confirming read-only whether each perspective's breakdown conditions are documented
- No file has been created, changed, or deleted at all (read-only, one-way reporting)
- intent-tree, intent-compass, and packets (+ the export draft) are cross-checked, applying all checks in the check catalog (the set of checks, their categories, and their severities are authoritatively defined by the table in
Execution Steps
Step 1: Confirm the prerequisites
- If
.intent/is absent, guide the user through the intent-planner setup steps (runningnpx intent-planner) and finish. - Partial absence of
intent-tree.md/intent-compass.md/.intent/packets/is non-blocking: do not stop; run the checks within the verifiable scope and report the missing deliverables as unverified targets (packets count as missing when.intent/packets/is absent oractive/is empty; in that case skip the packet-dependent checks).
Step 2: Read the deliverables
- Read
.intent/intent-tree.md,.intent/intent-compass.md,.intent/packets/index.mdand.intent/packets/plan.md, and the packet files subject to the checks (for cross-packet checks, read all files underactive/; do not readarchive/), plus.intent/cc-sdd/<slug>/*.md(the per-packet export drafts, if present) and the inherited issue directory'sdiscovery/<slug>-<rand>/mode.md→ else the single.intent/mode.local.md(legacy) → else.intent/mode.mdfor the mode state (the CONTRACT.md read fallback contract). For symbol-existence checks, a symbol counts as existing when reachable in either the split store.intent/compass/(when present) or the legacy body (dual-path; DR133). Intent-tree case records (機能追記/機能撤去/履歴/再起案) count as existing when reachable in either the split store.intent/tree/(when present) or the legacy form at the body tail (dual-path; the skeleton L0–L4 is in the body; tree-normalize / DR133). - You may partially load compass by domain scope (opt-in; federated-governance / INV101): when the target domain is determined by the domain argument or the case context, read and apply
rules/domain-scope.md. Do not full-load compass; pull only "the case's domain tag +always" with grep + inline tags (extending the INV47 pull discipline into the verification layer). However, axes that inherently need a full scan (compass-rule-decay/stale-questions/stale-assumptions/ cross-cutting matching axes whose population is allalwayssymbols) target all symbols, not narrowed by domain scope (do not weaken detection; B-fed5). For a legacy scaffold with no determinable domain and no tags, fall back to the legacy full read (backward-compatible; O3). Do not change the check catalog's axes, sections, severities, or temperature (only the range of symbols each axis loads changes). - Observe the downstream spec deliverables (cc-sdd’s
.kiro/specs/<feature>/*.md, or explicit references for other routes) read-only, solely as the counterpart fordraft-content-dropped(Step 3.17) — read them when present; skip that check when absent. Never rewrite an external tool's deliverables (INV1, the add-on principle). The- feature:appended line used to identify the counterpart lives in.intent/export-log/<packet-slug>.md. - If both mode.local.md and mode.md are absent, continue with the standard default and announce it (do not stop).
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed b469026ec942
- 2mo ago First seen · 257 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 6fd9db13bc7d
intent-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository ijust/intent-planner (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 15,728 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
repo-hygiene
Use when the scheduled repo-hygiene workflow runs from GitHub Actions (or an operator dry-run) to scan the repository for small, certain docs/test/code hygiene issues and fix them as one batched branch.
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
requirements-writer
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
refocusing
Use when a long-running agent may have lost the product outcome, when context was compacted, when work has crossed a major boundary, or when a fresh path-based trace is needed before the next consequential action. Not for fresh-session orientation, waking an idle seat, or checkpoints.
orchestration-team
Use when coordinating assignments, selected review boundaries, or blocked work across a rig.
oversight-team
Use when you are a seat on the oversight pod (a standing monitor-mode rig that keeps OTHER rigs healthy), configuring or running the drift detectors, or choosing whether to intervene vs escalate. Covers the pull-not-poll posture, the v0 detectors (premature-park, process-drift, off-task, token-burn), the intervention…