intent-validate

A read-only checker for an Intent Planning project, comparing its intent documents, work packets, and export draft for contradictions, missing coverage, inconsistent boundaries, and rule violations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review planning documents, verify documented user, operations, testing, and maintenance concerns, and identify missing or skipped checks.
Why use it?
It helps find conflicts and unchecked areas before implementation. It reports evidence, severity, and proposed fixes without changing files.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ijust/intent-planner/intent-validate
Any agent
npx skills add ijust/intent-planner --skill intent-validate
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ijust/intent-planner

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 15,748 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00047 $0.15748
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.07874
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.03150
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.01575

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6fd9db13bc7d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

intent-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

templates/en/claude/skills/intent-validate/SKILL.md · 257 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 257 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

intent-validate Skill

Core Mission

  • Success Criteria:
    • intent-tree, intent-compass, and packets (+ the export draft) are cross-checked, applying all checks in the check catalog (the set of checks, their categories, and their severities are authoritatively defined by the table in rules/validate-checks.md)
    • Findings are classified by severity (must-fix / recommended / info), and every item carries its check ID (the ID column of the table in rules/validate-checks.md), its evidence (file and the relevant statement), and a fix proposal (the skill to re-run or the fix direction)
    • Unverified targets (missing / unfilled deliverables, plus the IDs of skipped checks) are stated explicitly together with the reason
    • Packets are read statically from the four PBR perspectives (user / operations / test / maintenance), confirming read-only whether each perspective's breakdown conditions are documented
    • No file has been created, changed, or deleted at all (read-only, one-way reporting)

Execution Steps

Step 1: Confirm the prerequisites

  • If .intent/ is absent, guide the user through the intent-planner setup steps (running npx intent-planner) and finish.
  • Partial absence of intent-tree.md / intent-compass.md / .intent/packets/ is non-blocking: do not stop; run the checks within the verifiable scope and report the missing deliverables as unverified targets (packets count as missing when .intent/packets/ is absent or active/ is empty; in that case skip the packet-dependent checks).

Step 2: Read the deliverables

  • Read .intent/intent-tree.md, .intent/intent-compass.md, .intent/packets/index.md and .intent/packets/plan.md, and the packet files subject to the checks (for cross-packet checks, read all files under active/; do not read archive/), plus .intent/cc-sdd/<slug>/*.md (the per-packet export drafts, if present) and the inherited issue directory's discovery/<slug>-<rand>/mode.md → else the single .intent/mode.local.md (legacy) → else .intent/mode.md for the mode state (the CONTRACT.md read fallback contract). For symbol-existence checks, a symbol counts as existing when reachable in either the split store .intent/compass/ (when present) or the legacy body (dual-path; DR133). Intent-tree case records (機能追記/機能撤去/履歴/再起案) count as existing when reachable in either the split store .intent/tree/ (when present) or the legacy form at the body tail (dual-path; the skeleton L0–L4 is in the body; tree-normalize / DR133).
  • You may partially load compass by domain scope (opt-in; federated-governance / INV101): when the target domain is determined by the domain argument or the case context, read and apply rules/domain-scope.md. Do not full-load compass; pull only "the case's domain tag + always" with grep + inline tags (extending the INV47 pull discipline into the verification layer). However, axes that inherently need a full scan (compass-rule-decay / stale-questions / stale-assumptions / cross-cutting matching axes whose population is all always symbols) target all symbols, not narrowed by domain scope (do not weaken detection; B-fed5). For a legacy scaffold with no determinable domain and no tags, fall back to the legacy full read (backward-compatible; O3). Do not change the check catalog's axes, sections, severities, or temperature (only the range of symbols each axis loads changes).
  • Observe the downstream spec deliverables (.kiro/specs/<feature>/*.md) read-only, solely as the counterpart for draft-content-dropped (Step 3.17) — read them when present; skip that check when absent. Never rewrite an external tool's deliverables (INV1, the add-on principle). The - feature: appended line used to identify the counterpart lives in .intent/export-log/<packet-slug>.md.
  • If both mode.local.md and mode.md are absent, continue with the standard default and announce it (do not stop).

Read the full file on GitHub · 257 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 257 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 6fd9db13bc7d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

intent-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository ijust/intent-planner (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 15,748 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

rulesync

Generates and syncs AI rule configuration files (.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, copilot-instructions.md) across 20+ coding tools from a single source. Use when syncing AI rules, running rulesync commands, importing or generating rule files, or managing shared AI coding configurations.

dyoshikawa/rulesync · 64 tokens

establishing-project-context

Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.

GanyuanRan/Aegis · 45 tokens

autoprompt

Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke /autoprompt to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Never infer invocation from ordinary requests. Never resume from leftover artifacts without an explicit resume instruction.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 56 tokens

office-hours

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to…

GCWing/BitFun · 168 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

echo

Use when the user references past sessions, asks 'what did we do', 'do you remember', 'last session', 'recall', or 'continue from'.

cwinvestments/memstack · 35 tokens