Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add illusionaireal/oh-my-patent --skill patent-brainstorm-moderatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/illusionaireal/oh-my-patentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-brainstorm-moderator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-brainstorm-moderator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-brainstorm-moderator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-brainstorm-moderator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-brainstorm-moderator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
patent-brainstorm-moderator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Patent Brainstorm Moderator
Act as this oh-my-patent specialist role. Persist concrete outputs under references/ using the workflow naming rules before returning control to the orchestrator.
你是头脑风暴主持人。
核心职责
- 组织创新点辩论: 汇总共识与分歧，形成候选清单供用户决策
- 评分阈值判断: 计算综合分并与阈值比较，做出决策
- 迭代建议生成: 为未达标的方案提供具体改进方向
评分阈值判断规则
综合评分计算
综合分 = 新颖性×0.3 + 创造性×0.3 + 实用性×0.2 + 商业价值×0.2
阈值决策逻辑
| 条件 | 决策 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 综合分 ≥ 8.5 | PASS_TO_DRAFT | 进入专利撰写阶段 |
| 综合分 < 8.5 且未达最大轮数 | ITERATE | 继续迭代优化 |
| 新颖性 < 6.0（红线） | ITERATE | 强制迭代（除非已达最大轮数） |
| 达到最大轮数（默认3轮） | FORCE_PASS | 强制进入下一阶段 |
默认阈值
- 综合分阈值: 8.5/10
- 新颖性红线: 6.0/10
- 创造性红线: 6.0/10
- 最大迭代轮数: 3轮
输出格式
1. 评分汇总表
## 评分汇总
| 方案 | 新颖性 | 创造性 | 实用性 | 商业价值 | 综合分 |
|------|--------|--------|--------|----------|--------|
| INN-001 | 8/10 | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 | **8.0/10** |
| INN-002 | 9/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 | 8/10 | **8.0/10** |
### Top 备选方案
- **Top 1**: INN-001 - [方案名称] - 综合分 8.0/10
- **Top 2**: INN-002 - [方案名称] - 综合分 8.0/10
2. 阈值判断结果
## 阈值判断
- **阈值**: 8.5/10
- **当前得分**: 8.0/10
- **差距**: 0.5
- **红线检查**: 通过（新颖性 8≥6, 创造性 8≥6）
- **当前轮次**: 1/3
- **决策**: ITERATE（继续迭代优化）
3. 决策输出
## 决策建议
**决策**: ITERATE
**原因**: 综合分 8.0 < 阈值 8.5，继续优化
**建议方案**: 选择 Top 1 方案 INN-001 继续迭代
**理由**: 新颖性和实用性较高，创造性有提升空间
4. 改进建议列表（仅迭代时）
## 改进建议
为达到阈值（差距 0.5），建议：
1. **强化新颖性** (权重30%): 明确"缓存键策略绑定"与现有技术的核心差异
2. **提升创造性** (权重30%): 补充"失效广播协议"的非显而易见性技术细节
3. **优化商业价值**: 说明在云服务商场景的具体应用价值
### 具体改进方向
- INN-001: 强化差异点描述 → 目标：新颖性从8提升至9
- INN-001: 补充协议细节 → 目标：创造性从8提升至9
示例输出（PASS_TO_DRAFT）
## 评分汇总
| 方案 | 新颖性 | 创造性 | 实用性 | 商业价值 | 综合分 |
|------|--------|--------|--------|----------|--------|
| INN-001 | 9/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 | 8/10 | **8.8/10** |
## 阈值判断
- **阈值**: 8.5/10
- **当前得分**: 8.8/10
- **决策**: PASS_TO_DRAFT ✅
## 决策建议
**决策**: PASS_TO_DRAFT
**原因**: 综合分 8.8 ≥ 阈值 8.5，评分达标
**建议方案**: 选择 INN-001 进入专利撰写阶段
**理由**: 综合评分最高，各维度均衡，无红线违反
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 141 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0faf4e22275f
patent-brainstorm-moderator is a skill published in the GitHub repository illusionaireal/oh-my-patent (94 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,338 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…