Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add imMamdouhaboammar/get-fable --skill fable-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/imMamdouhaboammar/get-fableWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/fable-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/fable-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/fable-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/fable-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/fable-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02022 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00809 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
fable-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 599 B
- evals/scenarios.json 5.1 KB
- examples/ai-media-pipeline-walkthrough.md 2.3 KB
- examples/fintech-scale-walkthrough.md 2.4 KB
- references/communication-standards.md 3.7 KB
- references/subagent-role-distribution.md 2.5 KB
- references/tech-stack-matrix.md 5.9 KB
- references/vector-scoring.md 4.3 KB
- scripts/evaluate-architecture.py 3.5 KB runs code
- skill.package.json 717 B
- templates/docker-compose.microservices.yml 1.6 KB
- templates/microservices-manifest.toon 953 B
- templates/service-contract.proto 956 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 2957285912f8
fable-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository imMamdouhaboammar/get-fable (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,022 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other skills, from other repositories
detecting-broken-object-property-level-authorization
Detect and test for OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization vulnerabilities including excessive data exposure and mass assignment attacks.
exploiting-broken-function-level-authorization
Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating…
exploiting-excessive-data-exposure-in-api
Tests APIs for excessive data exposure where endpoints return more data than the client application needs, relying on the frontend to filter sensitive fields. The tester intercepts API responses and analyzes them for leaked PII, internal identifiers, debug information, or sensitive business data that the UI does not…
implementing-api-gateway-security-controls
Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point…
implementing-api-rate-limiting-and-throttling
Implements API rate limiting and throttling controls using token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window algorithms to protect against brute force attacks, credential stuffing, resource exhaustion, and API abuse. The engineer configures per-user, per-IP, and per-endpoint rate limits using Redis-backed counters, API…
implementing-api-security-posture-management
Implement API Security Posture Management to continuously discover, classify, and score APIs based on risk while enforcing security policies across the API lifecycle.