Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to impierce/ssi-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/impierce/ssi-agent/beta/.agents/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/impierce/ssi-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/grill-with-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/grill-with-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/grill-with-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00811 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
grill-with-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
75% identical to domain-modeling — 54 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Domain awareness
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 89 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 3e35025119ba
grill-with-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository impierce/ssi-agent (21 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 811 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 75% identical to domain-modeling, differing in 54 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
e-signature
Use when wiring an e-signature flow with DocuSign or Dropbox Sign — picking the SES/AES/QES legal tier, sending a PDF or template for signature, embedded signing, verifying signing webhooks, retrieving the signed PDF plus audit trail. NOT drafting contract text (that is contracts), NOT extracting fields from PDFs…
datenschutz-folgenabschaetzung-pruefung
Pruefung ob fuer ein Verfahren eine Datenschutz-Folgenabschaetzung nach Art. 35 DSGVO erforderlich ist und welche Schritte sie umfasst. Methodik Pruefung der Risikoindikatoren fuer ein hohes Risiko Abgleich mit Positivlisten der Aufsichtsbehoerden Pruefung des Ablaufs einer Folgenabschaetzung samt Risikobewertung und…
digitales-bildungswesen-schulverwaltung-pruefung
Prueft den Digitalisierungsstand von Schulverwaltungsprozessen eines Schultraegers bzw. einer Kommune zum Beispiel Schulanmeldung Lernplattform-Anbindung und Schulverwaltungssoftware. Methodik Sachverhaltsaufbereitung Einordnung Anforderungen Umsetzungsschritte Ergebnis. Output ausformulierte Pruefung mit Ergebnis zum…
datengetriebene-entscheidung-open-data-pruefung
Pruefung der Voraussetzungen fuer datengetriebene Entscheidungen einer Behoerde oder die Bereitstellung von Verwaltungsdaten als Open Data. Methodik Pruefung der Rechtsgrundlage Pruefung der Datenqualitaet und Data Governance Pruefung von Anonymisierung und Re-Identifikationsrisiko Einordnung nach den Open-Data- und…
eudi-wallet-einsatzpruefung
Pruefung ob und wie eine digitale Wallet zum Beispiel die EUDI-Wallet zur Vorlage von Nachweisen oder Attributen fuer eine Verwaltungsleistung genutzt werden kann. Methodik Analyse der benoetigten Nachweise Pruefung der Ausstellung als Attestierung Pruefung des Empfangs und der Verifikation durch die Behoerde…
it-sicherheit-grundschutz-checkliste
Checkliste der grundlegenden BSI-IT-Grundschutz-Anforderungen bei Einfuehrung eines neuen digitalen Verfahrens in einer Behoerde. Methodik Strukturanalyse und Schutzbedarfsfeststellung Abgleich mit einschlaegigen Bausteinen des IT-Grundschutz-Kompendiums Pruefung von Basisanforderungen zu Organisation Technik und…