Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to impierce/ssi-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/impierce/ssi-agent/beta/.agents/skills/ubiquitous-language/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/impierce/ssi-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/ubiquitous-language)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/ubiquitous-language"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/ubiquitous-language/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/ubiquitous-language"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/impierce/ssi-agent/ubiquitous-language.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01050 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00420 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
ubiquitous-language scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ubiquitous-language — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ubiquitous Language
Extract and formalize domain terminology from the current conversation into a consistent glossary, saved to a local file.
Process
- Scan the conversation for domain-relevant nouns, verbs, and concepts
- Identify problems:
- Same word used for different concepts (ambiguity)
- Different words used for the same concept (synonyms)
- Vague or overloaded terms
- Propose a canonical glossary with opinionated term choices
- Write to
UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.mdin the working directory using the format below - Output a summary inline in the conversation
Output Format
Write a UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md file with this structure:
# Ubiquitous Language
## Order lifecycle
| Term | Definition | Aliases to avoid |
| ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- |
| **Order** | A customer's request to purchase one or more items | Purchase, transaction |
| **Invoice** | A request for payment sent to a customer after delivery | Bill, payment request |
## People
| Term | Definition | Aliases to avoid |
| ------------ | ------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| **Customer** | A person or organization that places orders | Client, buyer, account |
| **User** | An authentication identity in the system | Login, account |
## Relationships
- An **Invoice** belongs to exactly one **Customer**
- An **Order** produces one or more **Invoices**
## Example dialogue
> **Dev:** "When a **Customer** places an **Order**, do we create the **Invoice** immediately?"
> **Domain expert:** "No — an **Invoice** is only generated once a **Fulfillment** is confirmed. A single **Order** can produce multiple **Invoices** if items ship in separate **Shipments**."
> **Dev:** "So if a **Shipment** is cancelled before dispatch, no **Invoice** exists for it?"
> **Domain expert:** "Exactly. The **Invoice** lifecycle is tied to the **Fulfillment**, not the **Order**."
## Flagged ambiguities
- "account" was used to mean both **Customer** and **User** — these are distinct concepts: a **Customer** places orders, while a **User** is an authentication identity that may or may not represent a **Customer**.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 94 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 2449e2345b96
ubiquitous-language is a skill published in the GitHub repository impierce/ssi-agent (21 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,050 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ubiquitous-language, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
e-signature
Use when wiring an e-signature flow with DocuSign or Dropbox Sign — picking the SES/AES/QES legal tier, sending a PDF or template for signature, embedded signing, verifying signing webhooks, retrieving the signed PDF plus audit trail. NOT drafting contract text (that is contracts), NOT extracting fields from PDFs…
datenschutz-folgenabschaetzung-pruefung
Pruefung ob fuer ein Verfahren eine Datenschutz-Folgenabschaetzung nach Art. 35 DSGVO erforderlich ist und welche Schritte sie umfasst. Methodik Pruefung der Risikoindikatoren fuer ein hohes Risiko Abgleich mit Positivlisten der Aufsichtsbehoerden Pruefung des Ablaufs einer Folgenabschaetzung samt Risikobewertung und…
digitales-bildungswesen-schulverwaltung-pruefung
Prueft den Digitalisierungsstand von Schulverwaltungsprozessen eines Schultraegers bzw. einer Kommune zum Beispiel Schulanmeldung Lernplattform-Anbindung und Schulverwaltungssoftware. Methodik Sachverhaltsaufbereitung Einordnung Anforderungen Umsetzungsschritte Ergebnis. Output ausformulierte Pruefung mit Ergebnis zum…
datengetriebene-entscheidung-open-data-pruefung
Pruefung der Voraussetzungen fuer datengetriebene Entscheidungen einer Behoerde oder die Bereitstellung von Verwaltungsdaten als Open Data. Methodik Pruefung der Rechtsgrundlage Pruefung der Datenqualitaet und Data Governance Pruefung von Anonymisierung und Re-Identifikationsrisiko Einordnung nach den Open-Data- und…
eudi-wallet-einsatzpruefung
Pruefung ob und wie eine digitale Wallet zum Beispiel die EUDI-Wallet zur Vorlage von Nachweisen oder Attributen fuer eine Verwaltungsleistung genutzt werden kann. Methodik Analyse der benoetigten Nachweise Pruefung der Ausstellung als Attestierung Pruefung des Empfangs und der Verifikation durch die Behoerde…
it-sicherheit-grundschutz-checkliste
Checkliste der grundlegenden BSI-IT-Grundschutz-Anforderungen bei Einfuehrung eines neuen digitalen Verfahrens in einer Behoerde. Methodik Strukturanalyse und Schutzbedarfsfeststellung Abgleich mit einschlaegigen Bausteinen des IT-Grundschutz-Kompendiums Pruefung von Basisanforderungen zu Organisation Technik und…