Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add inbharatai/claude-skills --skill templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/inbharatai/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/inbharatai/claude-skills/template)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inbharatai/claude-skills/template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inbharatai/claude-skills/template/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inbharatai/claude-skills/template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inbharatai/claude-skills/template.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00211 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
your-skill-name scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Your Skill Name
Overview
Describe your skill in 2–3 sentences. What problem does it solve? Who is it for? What makes it unique?
When to Use This Skill
Use Your Skill Name when you need to:
- [Trigger scenario 1]
- [Trigger scenario 2]
- [Trigger scenario 3]
Instructions
When this skill is active, Claude will:
- [First thing Claude does]
- [Second thing Claude does]
- [Third thing Claude does]
- [Fourth thing Claude does]
Examples
Example 1 — Basic Usage
User: [A simple request the user might make]
Claude: [How Claude responds — be specific and show the output format]
Example 2 — Advanced Usage
User: [A more complex request]
Claude: [How Claude handles the complexity — show reasoning and output]
Example 3 — Edge Case
User: [A tricky or ambiguous request]
Claude: [How Claude handles ambiguity — clarifying questions or sensible defaults]
Guidelines
Do:
- [Positive guideline 1]
- [Positive guideline 2]
- [Positive guideline 3]
Don't:
- [Negative guideline 1]
- [Negative guideline 2]
Dependencies
Required: [list tools, packages, or services — or write "none"]
Platforms
Available on: [claude.ai, claude-code, api — remove any that don't apply]
Part of the claude-skills collection — 183+ skills for Claude.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 77 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A e18821742056
your-skill-name is a skill published in the GitHub repository inbharatai/claude-skills (33 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
human-review
Produce a plain-English review of the files you just edited and gate the changes behind an explicit Approve/Undo choice. Use when the Stop hook from the human-review-skill plugin asks for a review (you'll see a prompt referencing an edit log), OR when the developer's most recent message is "1", "2", "approve", or…
optimize
Automatically refines every user prompt into a structured, actionable version, then immediately executes the optimized prompt. When triggered explicitly with "/optimize {prompt}", "optimize:", or "optimize prompt:", outputs the refined prompt as text instead.
kafka-event-driven-design
Kafka event-driven architecture designer and reviewer, at the application/client layer. ALWAYS use when designing, reviewing, or troubleshooting how a service produces or consumes Kafka events — topic and partition-key design, producer and consumer client configuration, consumer group topology, event schema definition…
mysql-migration
MySQL schema migration safety reviewer and DDL generator. ALWAYS use when writing, reviewing, or planning MySQL schema changes — ALTER TABLE, CREATE/DROP INDEX, column type changes, charset conversions, data backfills, or any DDL touching production tables. Covers online DDL algorithm selection (INSTANT/INPLACE/COPY)…
redis-cache-strategy
Redis caching strategy designer and reviewer. ALWAYS use when designing, reviewing, or troubleshooting Redis caching layers — cache pattern selection (cache-aside, write-through, write-behind), TTL strategy, cache stampede/penetration/avalanche prevention, hot key handling, cache-DB consistency, distributed locking…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging, diagnosing, or investigating any bug, test failure, flaky test, race condition, unexpected behavior, build failure, production incident, third-party breakage, root cause analysis, or performance regression before proposing fixes.